Taking a $1M lump-sum means never having to work again. That's not to say you won't work again, or won't be productive again. But I'd feel really stupid if at some later date I had to take a job, just because I pissed away my capital.
65 karma · joined February 22, 2007
Taking a $1M lump-sum means never having to work again. That's not to say you won't work again, or won't be productive again. But I'd feel really stupid if at some later date I had to take a job, just because I pissed away my capital.
The more general term is "register", which applies to the three forms of business: sole-proprietorships, partnerships, and corporations.
What you're thinking of is a business name registration. If you do business as your exact name, you don't need to register a name. If you make more than, $30k (I think), then you do need to register for a GST number.
I kept having the strange urge to talk directly to people like pg, Trevor Blackwell, Jessica Livingston, as if Justin were some kind of Telepresence bot, or medium. It's weird to think of him walking around, with all these "spirits" in his head.
The robot demo was fascinating, and I love the unscriptedness. I think I prefer that to an edited or scripted documentary. You can infer a lot from the raw data that wouldn't make it through the editorial process.
What are these LEO warheads of which you speak? Does he really mean ballistic missiles? In that case the speeds are very different.
Anyone know off-hand what extended instruction set these machine instances offer? I.e. MMX? SSE? SSE2?
"We're not talking customer service, we're talking cunnilingus! Are they happy? I want you to make them happy!"
I find I can't work at a reasonable pace. Either I'm slacking off, and for all intents look like an incompetent retard, or else, I'm in crisis mode and will do whatever it takes. Unfortunately, after crisis mode, I'm burnt out for a week.
There's an amazing feeling of monastic purity to working no-holds-barred on a problem, though. It's simplifying. No life -- no worries! That and the adrenaline rush of looking into the abyss and then finding some way around, or over.
http://www.plyojump.com/movies/qrio/sdr-4x_recoverfromfall.mpg
I doubt that. I don't think that would qualify as dynamic balance. Remember, it's only been a couple of weeks since Dexter's first step -- he's walking quite well.
This is one of those situations where the approach bounds the eventual utility. There are a lot of non-dynamically balanced robots that would just blow the minds of researchers from 20 years ago, but they are still limited.
By solving the dynamic balance problem, even though to the untrained eye it may currently look less impressive than some other systems, there's no more ceiling to what it can do, dynamically (control-wise, not accounting for power density). All of the behaviours you mentioned can be implemented on top of this substrate.
Saving a game stores a re-loadable state of the universe. Let's say saving or loading a state takes less than a second to initiate, and is impossible to do accidentally.
Would you lie? Cheat? Kill? (You don't have to answer).
What if N is 1, 10, 100?
What if N is uncertain?
What if there's a probability, p, of load failure?
Is Arc suited to writing its own IDE?
Is Arc suited to writing its own IDE?
If they're not regularly "going dark", they may not have the focus to succeed at a startup.
I love to debate (reddit has saved my wife a regular earful), but I can't imagine surfing when I'm really "in the zone". I tend to do more directed documentation queries and explicitly avoid sites like reddit where I'm likely to become mired.
So yeah, for me posting frequency is inversely correlated with how busy I am. On the other hand, all of that reading, researching and debating generates a lot of new ideas.