404 karma · joined June 30, 2015
There are creatures more disturbing in his movies than that zombie. The difference is the deep human empathy that goes into their creation.
IIRC, almost every frame in Ghibli movies is drawn by hand, so to see an AI created zombie that (in his view) mimics disabilities suffered by his friend in order to achieve a creepy effect, how could he not find it disgusting?
This isn't what he was saying at all. He has a friend, with something perhaps like Parkinson's. The zombie animation was clearly evocative of his friend's difficult movements. So to him, it's morally repulsive to create disturbing animation that isn't even drawn by a human that so closely resembles physical disabilities.
Whether or not it makes for good horror or art is another matter. He just finds the whole concept disgusting.
> He's not a fan of the grotesque, creepy, or disquieting.
Studio Ghibli has produced lots of work that's grotesque and disquieting. He's not against representing them.
Spirited Away and Grave of the Fireflies come to mind as films that show the grotesque in a way that there's a strong human spirit endowed in the animation.
This was my experience as well. When I was in holding, a sympathetic nurse told me that to get out of there as soon as possible, I needed to smile, go to all meetings, and do exactly as I'm told. There was a Bible study that I wasn't interested in going to, and another nurse heavily suggested that I attend, which I ended up doing. I felt very powerless throughout it.
On another note, one thing I've been thinking of doing, (and I'd be delighted if you did it!) is a job board that only shows positions with take home interviews instead of in-person coding exercises. I think this is a growing trend as people realize that they're missing out on good developers who suck at coding under pressure with someone looking over their shoulder. I've come across several threads on HN with people saying the same thing.
A guy writes about his brush with fame when MW was rude to him on Twitter.
I say this because when the article is hyping up the "timelessness" of this essay, I know that there is political motivation behind it, rather than some kind of (more nearly) objective opinion on it.
> That kind of diversity is painful and unpopular, but
> it is critical to health of a democratic and pluralistic
> society.
Is it? How does having someone who endorses xenophobia, sexism, etc, as one of the most visible members of your organization achieve these goals? If we tolerate this kind of thinking, how many opportunities are we losing out on because of people who couldn't get past the barriers it sets up?Airbnb is already making tangible changes based on this kind of data. One example is using it to make predictions of demand, and then tell Airbnb hosts the optimal price that they should charge to maximize revenue and chances of being booked.