jack9

Since it's now only good for once a week, they will not.

The lack of simple usage (account, transaction) fees, better interest rates, and better account security features do it for me.

That the vast majority can't afford, leaving the current status quo.

Not at all. I'm happy to complain all day long, but what good does it do week after week? 1:1s are not a make everyone happy and not an opportunity to retread the same old stories. We work in the same place, we see the same things. We don't work together that closely, you're too disconnected to understand and taking up time from my actual responsibilities. Weekly 1:1s aren't just a sign, but proof of bad management in any company.

> pseudonimization strategy in context of GDPR guidelines.

i.e. Doing the minimal work to meet the guidelines. Effectiveness is incidental to that goal. Maybe I misunderstood the GP tho.

I'm not making an argument. I'm stating a fact, because the gp stated an incorrect fact (a generalization about governments). You can take a look at a number of other world countries that have changed phone numbers for various reasons, amounting the to same thing. A trivial refutation of

> They don't do that* after the fact.

* = change the ownership of phone numbers/domains

Things happen slowly in the EU. That's not a surprise to those who live in it.

They have and do. https://voiceofpeopletoday.com/kim-jong-un-orders-change-num...

It's unusual for the French government, who has some of the strongest consumer protections on the planet.

Just because I rolled a ball downhill, doesn't mean I was solely responsible for starting it, but worked in tandem with the laws of nature that exists. Nor am I the god of the effects, just because I was an instigator.

That's not the same at all. That was consumer fraud.

Which makes it disingenuous to the initial headline.

> Renting Is Throwing Money Away Right?

Yes. Given a choice, you always want to own (or at least be building equity). That's the nature of the phrase in the headline. Having money act as an investment (growing/working) for you is preferable to not.

https://courses.washington.edu/css342/zander/css332/passby.h...

I mean, it's not hard to take a look at what was already decided.

Ok, so it's no fault of your own and you need a crutch, by your own reasoning.

> and by proxy the culture.

That doesn't follow at all. Lots of people remove themselves from their native culture, which is often toxic and sometimes benign.

This snarky bit seems like a derail in the middle of the article. Also, other than the enhance strategy (which is not illustrated other than a picture), there's nothing interesting said.

That's a matter of opinion, not a fact. It can be thought of as a shortcut for an applied mixin, without the needless pollution and boilerplate.

The concept of "Inciting a Riot" is one of the more obvious overreaches to control distasteful groups that leads us down the path of thought control (vis a vis postmodernism or original economic stratification). If someone is so ignorant or intent that they take an unlawful action due to spoken or written word, they had problems before. The edge cases are something more akin to accomplice. Those "rioter" problems were historically in education/comprehension (ironically something the internet has helped with in many cases) or mental defect or justified outrage. Because capitalistic and social opponents could not affect the changes they wanted or changes fast enough, the idea of a riot was born as a club. Even in america, the right to assemble is curtailed by the judicious application of this opposing legal construct.

It's a classification, so I don't think that's so. "Driver" is an equivalent term.

Here's a disclaimer: I worked at multiple Adtech companies in senior engineering positions.

> And of course you can get quite clever and fun here....create a function that checks if a function is a fibonacci number

The fact this is presented as a reasonable (trivial!) thing to embed in the DB screams, this is a terrible place to work.