3,605 karma · joined May 3, 2018
0) Subjecting fruitfly life to this kind of treatment is unethical.
1) Life is just physics in action.
2) Physics are just algorithm (or our physical world is a simulation)
It is not hard to understand why they think it is unethical.
My question are
1) is all life equal?
2) is all suffering unethical?
3) is this world materialistic or are there something out there?
4) should a list of items begin with 0 or 1?
Yacks
I think the market is buying more gold from US than ever -- this is trading US dollar for gold
US gold export is at its all-time high.
What make you think this won't degrade into some cat and mouse game?
I wonder how they are going to enforce this.
I meant, it would be great if this can be enforced without being yet another id verification scheme. ... but I am not optimistic on this one.
Debian allow you to choose different solver (typical Debian). It is easy to get galactic blow up if you insist.
Some model are more aggressive by default, some are more verbose by default. To get the result you want for your specific application, you run experiment with prompts and parameters.
In natural environment, they cohabitant with other animals. They migrates.
When we farm them, we remove anything not our primary product.
> Anthropic has signed the EU AI Act's Article 50(2) Code of Practice on Transparency of AI-Generated Content, ...
One simply does not have infinite time and resource to engage with everybody.
Aware what you have filtered and don't treat them like idiot
Where did you got that impression?
Apple Watch have lots of apps. It can make phone call and do voice recording without the phone nearby.
Imagine what one could do with an infinite Charisma, propaganda generating machine.
Doesn't this make including the jack even less justifiable?
If you are not going to tell us anything, why are you teasing us as if you will?
Holding back discussion points is not a way to advance a discussion
It is not that cheap when you adjust for the average hourly salary.
and imported goods are disproportionly expensive when you need them
Before LLM, the majority of the web was content farms... but those are instantly recognizable and we seldom fall into them. Now LLM mixed the content farm style writing with _some_ real content. It take time and effort to tell they are slop, causing much fatigue.
Oscilloscope is needed for things like frequency response.
but most consumer care only the power loss and bandwidth only.
I hate it when visual designer do a product design or ux design job.
I hate it when marketing just imagine some fake use case in their head.
Market Research is real research. UX study is a real study.
now everybody just vibe their job
To actually test for the bandwidth those are hell expensive.
Now people starting test for the chip, those scammers will install more fake chip ...
Does it have to?
I meant, it is a very common problem with lots of complain. I bet modern electronic can do it much less noise.
Does HN know something in this area?
The article have talked about this:
> You cannot, however, build a business model today on a cost breakthrough that has not happened yet. Even if costs do fall, Jevons paradox[5] tends to kick in: historically, when a resource gets cheaper, we find more uses for it rather than consuming less. Cheaper inference does not get banked as margin improvement; it gets consumed by deeper integration, more calls per interaction, more autonomous agents running in the background. The cost per call drops but the calls per user multiply.
You are describing asymmetric encryption. This article was talking about symmetric encryption.
Symmetric encryption is generally considered much harder to break than asymmetric encryption