iwr

Actually, there is a body of research attesting to your logic:

http://www.econtalk.org/archives/2006/11/peltzman_on_reg.htm...

My neighbour should not get screwed harder so we are made equal. There's no such thing as a "fair share" of rape.

Besides, if you look at the things the government is doing with the money recently vs. what Google is, there is no contest!

I wonder if it wouldn't just be cheaper to design NAT-friendly apps. By the looks of it, the transition would last a decade and there would still be large legacy infrastructure in place after that. So why not learn to love NAT and ipv4?

So what's wrong with setting up an account with a payment processor rather than paypal? The processor only provides the interface, but does not actually hold money hostage or have other arbitrary restrictions.