itemize123

what decisions did the CEO do that you would believe is poor? Just conceptually if examples are make you too easily identifiable - iam purely curious.

u cant compare productivity to games on the metric of bring joy - ofc productivity tool isn't bring joy like a game does.

how come? this is a very weird take- why is the focus on ppl suffering instead of like fairness or capital / market efficiency ?

Would you explain this - " I'm starting to think we would get more done if nobody on my team used Copilot." ?

Interesting to see if you why you see it destructive. I can certainly see that a lot of the times, copiloted solutions are working but less than ideal

don't agree with your logic at all - agree with your conclusion. your logic is deeply flawed - a) you've to justify mediocre engineers not been necessary, the mechanism they are pushed out by LLM matters. b) relative ranking is useless - it's the difference between absolute ability and that is close for say top 50% most likely. This might mean half of us will lose jobs, and half see compensation pressured but it's not as certain as your argument make it out to be.

if it helps - i strongly agree with you

it's actually easy to be turing complete. it's a feat for a system to be non-turing complete and be "complex".

does your pricing take account of cached vs uncached token?

they are doing it through state investment vehicles - so it's in the same way US companies can (but won't)

is it a net-win for the company? Are the AI-TOD any good?

what would you say the disconnect was? Was it a simple case of that your teams' not comfortable with merging AI code?

nothing foolish about trying even if he too thinks it's inevitable. it's foolish however to think that there won't be nuances of such a future (and somehow no one can influence the nuances).

yup - security reviews.

run it hosted on another provider - it's less censored there

actually distillation is without weights - you basically just need a black box teacher model.

try on another provider - it is open weights.

it will be more expensive when subsidization ends? how is it going to be more inclusive?

agreements don't always hold up to legal scrutiny. In cases where it is unreasonable, it won't be able to stand up in court. And in any case, this is not a legal matter but a user experience / public opinion one

you are being very disingenuous. there are certain expectations from a software vendor. taking things into extreme, if something install malware as an update on your computer, is it not a silly claim that it is free for vendor to do so?

with physical access right?

basically very verbose and detailed but also very indirect. didn't get to the point till the end.

same, i really dislike opencode's UX. there are a lot of agents harnesses actually. check out terminal bench 2.0 for example. dirac.run seems to be make the rounds earlier

google's the middleman, and it won't capture the whole 1600 right?

you are missing the picture here. would you then agree that agentic + selection is better than hand-written + selection? in that case, even if the advantage is project selection, nobody would choose to work in a hand-written way right?

unless the 5.4 price is a huge loss leader for them

probably the wrong take - they are arm racing to a better model. it's not enshittification era for models just yet

obviously no. if algos work in china, it will work with spacex

make the point directly - you are just avoiding further justification

can you also add a way to allow it to be used without screen-recording permissions?

are you sure other forms of language to express urgency doesn't work as well or better?