1,272 karma · joined August 30, 2009
What is the typical use-case for this or TorqueBox?
I shouldn't be driving a car if I don't have money for it. I should sell the car and always take bus, since later in the game it says I have that option.
I had to choose if I should stay with an hourly paycheck or work by the piece. I choose piece because then I thought I could put in some more work, but then it just said I couldn't work that much. Well if I had known that I would have stuck with an hourly check, that's math you can actually work out in real life before making that decision.
It says I have a college degree but that wont help me, and then it says I'm probably too uneducated to help out my children with math homework.
All in all some interesting facts about the american low-income society, but the choices and different aspects of it are very strange. You could do a lot more to save money as well as make more money than is presented here. Well basically, kind of annoyingly simplified.
Maybe I've just not kept up to date with what goes on with TextMate but to my knowledge there is nothing like this for TextMate and looking for packages for TextMate always becomes a googling quest for me.
Now of course, with TextMate, there's hundreds of packages doing more or less the same thing to different authors tastes, if the same thing happens with Sublime Text, there would need to be some sort of filtering in this package manager?
If you still can't enter the country you might as well be in your own country working in comfortability.
Not to mention there is a lot of stuff he could learn at college that would actually be tremendously useful if he wants to continue in this path. Everything from the physics of conductors to more advanced electronics design are things that can be quite hard to pick up from tutorials online.
But I think the question is really strange. It's like asking "What is the Porsche sedan lacking that the Volvo sedan provides?"
They're for different people. Photoshop in my mind is for professionals who use a lot of different tools to master their craft. While Pixelmator seems much more focused on photo-editing and some quick work.
Pixelmator makes design and (more advanced than iPhoto-) photo-editing more easily available to non-professionals.
If you really use everything Photoshop has to offer, I don't think the price is unreasonable. But few people do.
More often than not though, this method has left me lying in bed awake for 2-3 hours of inability to sleep due to thinking about nothing but that problem.
If I could get over the sleeplessness somehow, I would do this every time!
For instance, if I built a twitter bot replying to anyone saying "iPad" with a link, then the page at the end of that link was absolutely filled with ads. How much money would I make?
It seems to be a somewhat viable method of getting some cash because you see a lot of those bots around.
Otherwise it looks really nice. What metric services do you plan to integrate with?
Two things strike me as pretty weird sentences in the article.
>Worst-case scenario builders consistently underestimate the statistical probability of separate bad things happening simultaneously
There must have been more than three accidents at nuclear plants in the history of mankind. Yet three "misjudgments" make them consistently wrong?
>Actually, ever major nuclear accident has been worse than worst case, and that's a fact
How can something be worse than worst case? I don't understand what the article tries to claim that "experts" have deemed the worst case. Clearly Fukushima is not worse than worst case as there haven't even been a full meltdown or anything like that yet.
Second, what is "Every major nuclear accident". Have there only been 3 major nuclear accidents? What constitutes major?
Isn't that the idea that all the Q&A sites stem from?
I feel roughly the same as you. But I have actually asked questions both at StackExchange sites and Quora (and answered others in return for the help I received). And it certainly has it's uses to me.
If it's true, how could it possibly have happened? Could a powerful enough organization actually terrify all presidents from JFK and forward enough to not oppose them. Or do everyone see it as a decent system?
If it truly is "evil" what can be done against it?
Looking at the demo template all the content is in txt files and there's html templates with {{tags}} in them like that.
It would be interesting to know what's behind it all, it kind of looks like jekyll. But I'm not familiar enough to say so.
If they only get $10,000 for 3,2 millions views it seems almost likely that they're losing money, not making it...
Edit: A quick calculation tells me the expenses are actually quite negligible. The picture is 174kb * 3,2m servings * $0.03/GB for amazon cloudfront traffic (which I think they're using) means it's only cost them 16 bucks.
You should come to the hacker news meetup in February! I'm sure there are a lot of people who would love to meet you guys!
There was one thing that bothered me multiple times though, I couldn't distinguish between t and f fast enough on some occasions, I would suggest switching to a different font.
Also, a High-score list would make things complete.
Grooveshark is not doing anything illegal even if they might be "abusing the law".
The fact remains that people want to consume music in a way that the music industry does not allow.
If it werent for legal loopholes we wouldn't have YouTube and we wouldn't have tourism in eastern Europe. The world isn't as black and white as you portray it and Grooveshark provides an amazing service of much higher quality than Spotify.
We can't all sit on our hands and do nothing because someone in the world thinks we shouldn't. Innovation sometimes requires using loopholes.
Grooveshark is trying to build a business. To build a business on music you have to let people listen to music. Once they have working business-model (if they ever get there) they can get to paying the artists.
I agree it's somewhat twisted, but I think that's what is necessary.
What tipped you off to start talking about large files in a thread about UltraEdit?
EDIT: Just saw the thread about large files further down. Maybe you meant to make a reply?
I see this whole process as a fun learning experience of how difficult it can be to ship a physical product (fun because i'm not on their end).
I don't need the product so who cares if I have to wait for it...