673 karma · joined April 2, 2012
Windows 7 was great.
Windows 10 is not. Having a good cross platform code editor surely isn't going to make me use Windows 10.
Different tools for different jobs. If you wander too far from the main domain of the language, you'll find quirks and it's maybe better to use something else.
I've had difficulties implementing similar things in the past.
No, I don't. But all my friends wanted an iPhone and they're not programmers.
I think most people didn't know or even consider one could develop apps for phones at the time. Or why would someone want apps on a phone. Or even what an "app" is. They only knew "programs" on Windows.
People bought what was available. There were starting to appear some apps for Nokia phones but it wasn't widely popular. It was also a hassle to download / update.
Less features? The only thing I can think of are the advanced topology surfaces that rhino has. I'd argue most people don't need or want those.
What I REALLY dislike about max is the subscription model. It encourages piracy in all but the wealthiest nations worldwide.
But the biggest downside of all is being windows only.
I've made some changes like make the left gutter grey have grey background (so I know where it starts and ends) and some other changes for the way I like to see html, php, js and css. I might have broken the syntax for other languages.
https://github.com/inod/contraste/blob/master/Contraste.tmTh...
I don't remember computers without pkzip/pkunzip. They've always been around, many copies on floppies containing games and other software, maybe just in case someone ever found a computer without them.
My school computers also had them, and we quickly learned there wasn't any benifit of compressing a compressed file. We had pointless discussions about comparisons with arj and rar without even knowing how they worked.
Chrome shows wrong, washed out or desaturated colors everywhere (not just embedded images without color profiles or wrong gamma, but css hex colors), it's a big difference from Safari, Firefox and specially from browsers on Windows machines and phones.
I think I'm going to be needing one soon.
I've been using it for a year and haven't seen any ads so far, not even video ads from big or small websites.
The macOS version is free so you can test it. The iOS version is $1 and it's very worth it.
I'm using spf and dkim, ip is not blacklisted, and the domain I'm sending from has a let's encrypt cert, but my emails still go to gmail spam. (Outlook also, but yahoo goes to the inbox)
Now that I'm thinking, the emails are sent using postfix through the fqdn (subdomain.example.com) which is not served by http and hasn't hot a cert.
If this is the case should sending the emails through example.com or add a cert to host.example.com work?
Or is there another mechanism to use let's encrypt certs for email?
I already use Google Analytics and it works really great. I don't need the other features and I don't want to include the whole framework just to display ads, it seems really overkill.
I'm glad we have an option to use AdMob separately, please don't take it away.
I was updating my app and AdMob and they want me to use Firebase now. https://firebase.google.com/docs/admob/ios/quick-start
I wanted to know why should I include it just to use AdMob so I checked the video on the page: https://youtu.be/9qCxo0D-Sak They promise to explain benefits for me but they only tell me how to use it. The docs also don't do it.
It seems to me that it solves more some problem Google has than the developers have.
Similarly I use Sublime Text and I've tried vim some 10 times and it's also not for me.
It's unbelievable the number and pace of breaking changes.
As an advice, it's less work to disregard the sdk and implement using curl.
Very sloppy and unprofessional from a company that was born, grew and even made their own php.