HNHacker News
TopNewBestAskShowJobs

ignitionmonkey

977 karma · joined October 12, 2014

submissionscomments
ignitionmonkey··on Aegis Authenticator – Open-source 2FA for Android
Might have a solution for you here:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25804860

ignitionmonkey··on Aegis Authenticator – Open-source 2FA for Android
To add to this. Aegis supports any cloud provider that implements Android's "Storage Access Framework".[1]

https://github.com/beemdevelopment/Aegis/issues/258#issuecom...

ignitionmonkey··on Aegis Authenticator – Open-source 2FA for Android
They're pretty similar apps in terms of features (Aegis does all of that too).

Personally, comparing screenshots, I think Aegis' interface and choice of colours is more sleek, especially in dark and OLED modes, so it got my pick.

ignitionmonkey··on Aegis Authenticator – Open-source 2FA for Android
If you have root access, yes.[1] Otherwise no, sadly. One of the reasons I moved off Authy before it got worse.

There is a workaround using the Authy Desktop app but I have no idea if it works.[2]

[1] https://github.com/beemdevelopment/Aegis/pull/107

[2] https://gist.github.com/gboudreau/94bb0c11a6209c82418d01a59d...

ignitionmonkey··on The Games That Weren’t
I don't think there's a "but" here. Unseen64 also does that. We can have both. They made some in-depth videos a few years back on DidYouKnowGaming's YouTube channel.

https://www.youtube.com/user/DYKGaming/search?query=unseen64

ignitionmonkey··on Malware on My Android Phone
It's actually not that difficult. F-Droid has a few offline scanners. It depends of course on how much of your experience you want automated. Though it would be nice if Android let you control the more granular permissions like network access.

https://f-droid.org/en/packages/com.secuso.privacyFriendlyCo...

https://f-droid.org/en/packages/de.t_dankworth.secscanqr/

ignitionmonkey··on Automatically sending Webmentions from a static website
Just to correct your blog post, the Webmentions spec says in this scenario where you're just logging, you "MUST" return a 202 Accepted. I went through a similar phase (logsink with 204) which I corrected recently.

https://www.w3.org/TR/2017/REC-webmention-20170112/#h-receiv...

I was wondering if I should've sent this comment as a webmention instead but I guess old habits die hard.

← PreviousPage 2 of 2