I'd wait to blame the EU also.
1,250 karma · joined February 16, 2011
I'd wait to blame the EU also.
That's a an analogy-- a literary technique the writer is using, to show the correspondence between the price of a specific amount of DDR5 RAM to a fully integrated system, so the reader can follow the conclusions of their article easier.
You will not know how long it takes to get a zero day fixed, because zero in "zero day" ends when the vendor is informed:
> "A zero day vulnerability refers to an exploitable bug in software that is unknown to the vendor."
I think you're using a different definition of zero day than what is standard. Any zero day vulnerability is not going to have a patch you can get with an update.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UPS_Airlines_Flight_6
> The report indicated that the fire was caused by the autoignition of the contents of a cargo pallet that contained more than 81,000 lithium batteries and other combustible materials
Different horses, then.
Both Spotlight and Photos will find text in screenshots.
Because someone decided to break convention and use one in a four-digit year.
- Their skills.
- Their time.
- The required materials to properly perform the surgery.
They can't volunteer:
- The support staff around them required to do surgery.
- The space to do the surgery.
Surgery isn't a one-man show.
What did you mean by "Surely they could volunteer to do some charity surgery in their own time. They aren't slaves?"
1) scp
2) dpkg --set-selections
which part of the article leads you to believe this?
An LLM is a language model and the gestalt of human experience is not just language.
Its obvious there's no intelligence behind it when you make it try to do something with data that gets parsed by a computer.
There's a very material difference.
And if you look at the tick marks on the graph, it starts before 1960.
That said, 1.5C is tiny.
Only pass because of the eccentricity, or for some other reason?
It could be ludicrous, if that argument were being made.
You can't configure it like that, most of the BGP implementations I'm familiar with automatically treat the a same-AS neighbor as iBGP and a different-AS neighbor as eBGP.
Juniper explicitly has 'internal' and 'external' neighbors, but you can't configure a different peer AS than your own on an internal neighbor or the same peer AS on an external neighbor.
BGP sessions also have the AS of the neighbor specified in the local config, and will not bring up the session if it's not what's configured.