3,112 karma · joined May 4, 2021
I would not understand the last two sentences. Sidle? Tromp? I don't think I've seen these words enough times for them to register in my mind.
"Strode", I would probably understand after a few seconds of squeezing my brain. I mean, I sort of know "stride", but not as an action someone would take. Rather as the number of bytes a row of pixels takes in a pixel buffer. I would have to extrapolate what the original "daily English" equivalent must have been.
- Hosting a website is not so easy for the average person, even the tech savvy person, specially if you try to learn it now using the way large websites are developed.
- Static site blogs lack interactivity: people can't comment on your blog. You have to post a link to Twitter or HN (here!) and interact with people over there.
- Static site blogs also don't usually let people "subscribe" by email or whatnot, so unless people bookmark your website or follow you on Twitter, they are not going to find your content.
P.S. this is a problem area I'm trying to work on, at least on the technical front.
GPUI is not "native OS widgets".
The turning point might have been Heroku? Prior to Heroku, I think people just assumed you deploy to a VPS. Heroku taught people to stop thinking about the production environment so much.
I think people were so inspired by it and wanted to mimic it for other languages. It got more people curios about AWS.
Ironically, while the point of Heroku was to make deployment easy and done with a single command, the modern deployment story on cloud infrastructure is so complicated most teams need to hold a one hour meeting with several developers "hands on deck" and going through a very manual process.
So it might seem counter intuitive to suggest that the trend was started by Heroku, because the result is the exact opposite of the inspiration.
Current version focuses on static site hosting, with templates and zero-config localhost preview, one button to publish changes live.
Part of making this project involves creating a GUI framework for Go
Using flexbox-like layout system, it can render UIs for desktop apps in pure go (without using html/js/css).
ok, you think it's a promising field and you want to explore it, fine. Go for it.
Just stop pretending that what these models are currently doing is good enough to replace programmers.
I use LLMs a lot, even for explaining documentation.
I used to use them for writing _some_ code, but I have never ever gotten a code sample over 10 lines that was not in need of heavy modifications to make it work correctly.
Some people are pretending to write hundreds of lines of code with LLMs, even entire applications. All I have to say is "lol".
Because they can't.
Also, Clean Code is a really bad ideology, you should regret wasting time on it regardless of LLM code generation.
I guess that would not get much engagement though!
That said, cool write up and experiment.
Backups are definitely part of the vision. Not just for maintenance purposes but because the whole point is to have ownership and control not just of the site itself but the data on it.
The other part is the ability to move to any other host seamlessly.
You should show gratitude, not hostility.
I intend to make my products source-available but not open source.
I do open source libraries/frameworks that I produce as part of producing the product, but not the product itself.
I don't like the term "rug-pull". It's misleading.
If you have an open source version of Zed today, you can keep it forever, even if future versions switch to closed source or some source-available only model.
opt-out is not enough, specially in a program where opt-out happens via text-only config files.
I can never know if I've correctly opted out of all the things I don't want.
"Translated by Nancy Qanfar"
It does not even require the target node to be created with a virtual dom in the first place. Just diff the node with the given tree structure efficiently.
Internally the browser might need to create a few accelerator data structures, but that's an implementation detail.
https://github.com/WICG/webcomponents/issues/1069
My proposal only adds one native function with nothing else: no new data types, no new apis.
More specifically, a native implementation of the "patch" function:
patch(target_dom_node, virtual_dom)
Where `virtual_dom` is just a plain-data description of the DOM.Most of the "slowness" of the DOM come from its requirement to be a 90's era Java style object hierarchy.
Don't call it "templating". Just call it "virtual dom". Everyone knows what that means.
I had thought the industry has matured by now, but nope, still running the same old scripts!
I think it's aimed at HR/recruiting.
Companies tend to think in terms of specific skills when hiring. Something like: We use PostgreSQL, so we will write "3 years PostgreSQL experience" in the job description for a senior backend engineer position.
Unless engineering is explicitly involved in the hiring process, HR will drop your resume automatically if you say "5 years of MySQL and SQLite experience" with no mention of Postgres.
At least I personally liked it better.
Yes macOS has builtin OCR, but what about the translation itself? You still need a cloud service for that.
If you want to read Japanese but lookup words/kanji you don't understand, I have a tool for that (full disclosure: it's a paid app) that I developed for exactly this purpose. Yomitai: https://yomitai.app/