People aren't even agreed on what is "good" code.
55 karma · joined January 21, 2021
People aren't even agreed on what is "good" code.
Due to this I believe addiction itself has an inherently bad quality: Users with more tolerance could seek to increase their dosage, and they're more at risk of overdose.
We are not sure if it's not carcinogenic, or not having other long term damages. But only due to limited data, and does not mean it actually is safe.
>And READ the educational material before commenting!
Seems like a real condescending way to reply.
Being a business is the reason you want right to repairs. If a single vendor can bankrupt your business then it's not a sustainable business. Right to repair give you cheaper options for repairing your tools.
- In medical: your doctor should be responsible for your diagnosis and drug company is responsible for defective drugs, except when they get away with lobbying and hiring good lawyers.
- In physics: I'm not sure if it's as big of a problem as in social networks. But consider this case: If you cannot reproduce the result of an experiment due to a ML model being cryptic, that would lead to huge credibility issue in science.