1,407 karma · joined January 14, 2015
Really? I used this just a few weeks ago and definitely got a Windows 10 ISO.
https://www.microsoft.com/software-download/windows10ISO
For reference, I searched the following on Google
> windows 10 iso
I said the neighbours called me ****
Station said they can't play that
[..]
Same old stories, nothing new told
Appear to speak truth but don't be too bold
They say make a song for the radio
Hey ho something to play on the day show
Your music upsets advertisers
It's 'bout the Peso, what they say goes
They were left out of significant airplay because their breakout hit tells the story about how the lead, as a half-black brit with a white mom, has been called the N-word and told to go back to "where he comes from". The breakout hit is called "We Live Here", for those curious.Or, in fact, sending off to Google Fonts. As a German court case reveals, that is considered sending the IP to Google -- breaking GDPR since it is done without consent on first launch of the site.
I think this is misleading. `serde_json` is designed to parse JSON documents directly into your user-defined structs. Thus the raw `Value` type isn't optimized for direct manipulation.
That said, what do you expect? The `Value` enum has the `Value::Array` variant that contains a `Vec<Value>`, which is 24 bytes in itself. One for the heap pointer, one for the length, and one for the capacity. Because of alignment requirements the enum discriminant must thus also be aligned at the 8-byte boundary. This gives us a 32-byte type.
It is possible to reduce the variant to 16 bytes by making the value type `Box<[Value]>` instead. Ignoring the `Value::Object` variant for a second, that would make `Value` a 24-byte type. However, you've now also made the type immutable. It's a tradeoff. 8 bytes for mutable values.
Again, do remember that deserializing into `Value`s is _not_ the primary path when working with JSON through `serde_json`.
And the interviewer is an American. They're talking about American conditions. Where he defected isn't that important within that context. Additionally, he moved to Los Angeles a couple of years before this interview was conducted. Specifically to have an easier time connecting with his audience.
Bezmenov defected in 1970. After his defection would not be privy to any new information. The interview is from 1984 and not 1985 as the title purports. Ultimately, the claims in this video are categorically false. We can observe this in two ways.
First, after the collapse of the USSR no information on these efforts was revealed. Bezmenov claims 85% of the KGB's efforts are spent on this supposed program of ideological subversion of the American public. And yet, we have seen no documents. No intelligence from the US side. Nothing.
Second, he claims the subversion was put in place to change the schooling system and thus indoctrinate the next generation. Keep in mind that this program would've had to be in place by 1970. And quite a few years earlier than that too since, again, Bezmenov was not a particularly privileged member of the KGB. And if we were to assume the program is real the changes should blindingly obvious in hindsight. But in fact, there are none.
So we must look a little closer at Bezmenov - why would he claim these things, and why does the interview keep resurfacing?
At the time of the interview there was a great panic around communist influence across the country. We're in the middle of Reagan's first term as president. Reagan was hawkish on perceived communist sympathies, just like the rest of the Republicans and the mainstream American right-wing. The market for people claiming that the ideological foundations of their political rivals is grounded in communist indoctrination. They wanted to hear how homosexuality becoming more accepted, a call for racial equality, and a general anti-establishment attitude was, in fact, Soviet indoctrination of the schooling systems.
Bezmenov earned his living peddling what this large group of conservatives wanted to hear, and that is where his lectures and this interview come in.
Today we see claims of "cultural marxism" and "post-modernism" infecting universities, and thus infecting the minds of the very late cohort of millenials and the early cohort of Gen Zs. It's the same dance of comfort we saw in the 80s playing out again. The interview isn't someone predicting the future because of some special insight. It's someone playing into the 80s "culture war" and people recognizing that a similar "culture war" is happening again today. A "culture war" that will continue to happen as long as societies continue to evolve and re-evaluate their collective values.
> It still snows and ices in suburbia, and suburbia isn't always flat. So while not fjording a creek AWD and higher clearances are useful.
SUVs are becoming status symbols here too but you're kidding yourself if you think AWD is in any way needed for snow driving. In the Alps the majority of cars are still sedans and station wagons, same as Norway and Sweden, even during the snowy winters. If anyone pushing the car enough to need AWD on public roads they likely shouldn't be driving in the conditions in the first place.
> Long road trips are not doable in a cramped sedan for a family of four.
We regularly drove just under 400 kilometers (each way) to visit my dad's family in a Peugeot 406 station wagon. I was 19 when they got rid of that car. My dad is 195 cm, my mom is 175, and us three kids were all tall for our ages. The reason to get rid of it wasn't lack of space but the electric wiring going haywire. We even did roadtrips when going on holidays. From Denmark to Sicily on a 3 week vacation with plenty of space to spare in the trunk.
> Cargo area balance with passenger area
SUVs have comparable trunk volume to station wagons.
> Occasional towing
You can tow stuff with sedans/station wagons too. The towing capacity to SUVs sold here is comparable to regular cars. The size of the car really doesn't matter much. Only engine, frame strength, and braking power. You can find those things on regular cars just as well. I've moved plenty of times. Rent a big box trailer for a day and you're golden, which I assume is the same procedure in the US? A standard Volvo V60 is allowed to tow 2000 kg, that's just around 4400 pounds. I have a feeling most people wouldn't need more than that.
The German DPA has ruled that the usage of Google Fonts on a website broke GDPR because it forced the user's browser to reveal their IP to Google.
To be clear to anyone reading: using Google Analytics without a non-Google-hosted anonymisation step breaks GDPR. This _has_ been litigated in court in several countries. There's no "ifs" or "buts" about it.
Additionally, according to a core Tokio developer, the time between .await calls should be in the order of 100s of microseconds at most to ensure the best throughput of the runtime.
Cliff Biffle's great series of blog posts called "Learn Rust the Dangerous Way" takes the fastest C program from a benchmark game entry, rewrites it naïvely in Rust using copious amounts of `unsafe`, and then transforms it into program without `unsafe` while keeping it idiomatic. The last version is faster than the C implementation.
It's a toy example but it's real-world example.
If you add prepend an element to an existing list, no copy is necessary. It's just a new head with the tail being the original list. That's an easy case.
If you add a node in the middle of the list you can still share the unchanged tail between the two slightly different prefix sequences.
He covers the "Tic-Tac" and "Go Fast" videos too, just not in that specific video. Like in this one, where he explains how the "Go Fast" video isn't actually even a fast object zipping just above the water, but rather an object flying at roughly wind-speed at about 12000 feet.
This Polygon article touches on some of the process and considerations: https://www.polygon.com/2020/2/6/21125680/film-vs-digital-de...
S02E04 that came out today (Friday) had me uttering "He's so fucking good" out loud, despite being alone in the apartment. About Gary Oldman, that is. The way he hates absolutely everyone and cares about nothing, while showing that he deeply cares about his employees/Joes and justice. It's all there in the writing too, of course. There's just something about the way Gary Oldman portrays it that gives it an extra layer of authenticity. The man can act.
For reference, I can only be legally fired if I'm sick for more than 186 days in a 365 day period.
I'm still not convinced this is enough. The US "CLOUD Act" can force employees of a company to pull data even when hosted in foreign countries. If an ops engineer technically can give themselves access they can be forced to do so by the US federal government. That is my understanding anyway.
Additionally, released prisoners might become your neighbor. Do you want a hardened criminal or a reformed citizen to move in?