groestl

> the cost of building those unique shaped legos explodes with the size of the lego piece required.

The cost of plastic injection molding is almost entirely due to the cost of creating the steel mold. My argument is: with LLMs we are entering a world which makes it cost effective to build many more things from scratch, which is akin to going from building things out of pre-fabricated lego pieces to 3D printing (agreeably not cost effective for everything, but for many things).

We might not even need libraries after all, since APIs, libraries and abstractions in general exist for humans to grasp complexities. Abstractions have their merits, but they have downsides too, and AI might be a way to solve them. The interesting part for me is where that ends, because it's systems all the way down, and even on a higher level abstractions exist to allow humans to make sense of the world. Services, products, companies, political parties, what if in the future we don't need any of it anymore because the abstraction is obsolete?

Simple toolchain which supports trivial lightweight deployment is my go to attribute to select Go in projects.

The signal is the ceiling.

Intuitively I'd say lashing out on an LLM overconstraints it and so worsens the output, therefore the skill to stay calm and neutral is useful for guiding a machine as well. Would be useful to have data on that.

> It wasn't written by a human so they see no human value in it.

Which is true, in a way, the data put down as documentation can now be calculated in seconds, and documentation is just a cache.

AI is what we were missing to be fully cooked. Quite literally.

> we still have to keep them chugging along on Java 8

There's something else amiss here. Compared to other platforms, upgrading Java, even on complex codebases, has never been a nightmare for me.

I can prove I'm human by losing a claw machine.

Maybe plan itself was also generated by an LLM

Maybe managers going back to coding.

More money right?

I guess they just close the PR.

And recruiter agents still do.

If you're able to predict, you're able to simulate.

> are so evenly matched

It's because the real value of the models is in what we (humanity) fed them, and all of them have eaten the same thing for free.

Well, my business would be paying the trips, and everybody still refuses. So it's not the money.

Let's call it a valid UUIDv0 - all bits randomized including the version bits :)

Not sarcasm. Not cynism. Just pure humor.

I don't do any moral judgement at all, and I also don't predict the future.

I respond to "You are not causing more water to be used by asking a human to work on something.", because that statement is false. (Mental) work has an effect on the human metabolism.

> You are not causing more water to be used by asking a human to work on something.

That's certainly not true. Asking me to think hard about something will cause me to burn more calories. Asking me to do physical work even more so.

There are projects where long term addicts are given pure medical heroin (Diamorphin) in a controlled environment, and they do considerably better than their control group who does not receive their drugs like that.

E.g. https://patrida.de/

100%. I don't want to know how the sausage was made. It's similar to research papers, or history books, where the way we arrive at results or outcomes in the real world is often quite different from the way it's presented in the final form.

And your data.

If you're self hosting your compiler on C, you are your own user.

Sounds like your daily interactions with Legal. Each time a different take.

I'd never share my pizza. A one pizza team, that's just me.

Maybe I'm missing something, or we do it differently here, but I think "spec" is defined to narrowly in that article. Start writing the first part of that document in that meeting, and everything ties together neatly.

I also discuss on a local newspaper forum as well, which is pretty popular, but the crowd here tends to be more insightful :)

We might be able to bring back some nuclear reactors, but building new one's: that's not on a feasible timeline.