586 karma · joined May 13, 2020
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-disrupts-n...
This also sounds like it will reinforce some negative behaviors. If the data shows that other companies are paying women 80% of their male peers, shouldn't this recommend I also pay women 80%? But I doubt the output will spell it out that way, will I even know it's influencing me this way?
Galaxy trucker has a good app and would recommend it both on mobile and in real life. Sidereal Confluence is highly complicated, high investment game that's based on frantic negotiation, I can't recommend it unless you're seriously into games.
Either way, it's the responsibility of humans to design risk controls. When the AI makes a mistake it should be auditable how it came to that decision. The humans need proper training and regular exercises and ultimately to be held accountable.
I believe this achievable for those that want to achieve it.
Most Nintendo cartridges will function a decade from now. Many discs for other consoles don't even have the full game on it... and many can't function without connecting to a service. I'd prefer the system that is possible to preserve (but gets aggressive with monetization) then the one that's impossible to preserve.
Points to xbox for doing well with backwards compatibility and carrying libraries forward. But that could change in future.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blocking_of_Telegram_in_Russia
If it's predominantly being misused, then they do have a moral obligation. They control the packaging, and they know how much of it will end up improperly discarded. And by moral obligation, I really mean it should be a regulation to capture the damage done. Perhaps the recycling deposit from aluminum cans should be expanded.
By your metrics, it'd be hard to argue that things aren't getting worse in last decade. I'm not arguing things are worse now, just that you chose bad measures.
Consumer Reports does independent testing with their established criteria. But it's a paid service and doesn't do user submitted reviews.
Steam gets gamed with review bombs but provides plenty of transparency and data for people to make informed decisions. They identify recent review biases and show spikes in volume. Importantly Steam has a generous refund policy with little friction, so they have a profit incentive to match you to a game you want to keep.
I think that reinforces GP point that consumers aren't driven by privacy. Firefox didn't take off due to privacy, it took off because IE6 was a miserable experience. The killer features that drew people to firefox were pop-up blocking, tabbed browsing and less crashes.
Looking at who's doing development on AI, I have my predictions for the likeliness of altruistic AIs.
I expect what the average investor actually demands is restraint and keeping porn out peoples faces so it doesn't become what you're known for. Don't become a "porn company" and don't show porn to people that haven't opted in or to children.
Also reddits use of threads/upvotes can trend discussion towards a general consensus. If I want a recommendation for something that consensus is useful (eg r/televisions weekly recommendations). Discord is kind of a crapshoot of whoever is active at the time.
Am I missing something with discord? I'm a user but I generally don't engage in large communities. And there is so much "filler" discussion, that is hard to lurk.
I'm curious what the research would say about discord for example. Something centered around a participatory activity or around a group of friends.