197 karma · joined March 26, 2007
"Frozen water is a very strong heat conductor compared to typical Martian regolith. As a result, near-surface ice measurably influences seasonal surface temperature trends, and the depth of the H2O table controls the amplitude of this effect. We leverage this influence on orbital temperature observations using a numerical heat transfer model to derive regional and local maps of the ice depth on Mars, at much higher spatial resolution than previously available. We show that water ice is present sometimes just a few cm below the surface, at locations where future landing is realistic, under mobile material that could easily be moved around. This ice could be exploited on-site for drinking water, breathable oxygen, etc., at a much lower cost than if brought from Earth."
The old joke of "We find water on Mars every 18 months" is only true when observing though the lens of popular media and newspapers. The references section of any of these publications are clear evidence that no one has forgotten the earlier evidence.
https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2019GL08...
Available through various institutions for free. You'll find the authors to be established Mars scientists who've been weighing in on the water/ice (and other things) discussions over the years.
Look, it's even a real thing: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alarm_fatigue
https://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl/multimedia/images/?ImageID=439...
Another reason is the decisions are made ... ok, perhaps only influenced by committee ... you have to satisfy at least a significant subset of the Mars research community with your site selection. See this site for public information on the process:
https://marsnext.jpl.nasa.gov/
There are a number of other hard engineering concerns, like limits on latitude based on heating (or solar power) requirements, e.g. if you go to far north or south you have to use all your available power to heat the spacecraft and won't have any left to do science. I don't remember the exact values, but I think existing technology puts you in a +/- 60 degrees from the equator. I think it was even less than that, but I don't recall exactly.
* Provide a proper description to the organizers * Ask the organizers that they skip pizza that night or handle the logistics himself * Prepare properly for the presentation * Be considerate of your audience when presenting * Ask that the organizers tone down the commercials * oh, well, I guess you're hopeless on this one
Seriously, meetup groups tend to be community oriented and driven and members almost always have a voice.
Or just don't go, that's really fine, they are definitely not the most time efficient way to learn to program.
https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/102942
Edit: spelling and a little more info.
http://www.nasa.gov/press-release/nasa-s-europa-mission-begi...
We should be there within the next 10 to 15 years.
I am very procedure oriented and have always liked checklists and templates. I have just created a github repo to share checklists and templates here:
https://github.com/godber/software_dev_templates_and_checkli...
Feel free to contribute if you think its a good idea.
I've started it out with the Fog Creek checklist ... if Fog Creek guys don't like my having included it, I'll happily take it down.
http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl/news/whatsnew/index.cfm?FuseAct...
These are published in a manner that is consistent with Science's publication rules.
I think the standard release delay is six months. Though I'd say its less about exclusive access to data than it is about ensuring the consistency of that data. MANY things change in the early days of a mission.