Otherwise also fundraising (as someone else said).
Though for both of these, if the business is cash-strapped, the results would have to be pretty much assured.
1,089 karma · joined March 27, 2008
Otherwise also fundraising (as someone else said).
Though for both of these, if the business is cash-strapped, the results would have to be pretty much assured.
The "disbale notifications on the specific channels" does not work for me, because I do not actually want to do so. I just want to not get notifications during off hours (or at meetings, family stuff, etc), and I not want to configure it (or set myself away) for every team I'm logged in (right now, that's 10 teams).
Slack needs a global "mute" button. Slack feels designed as if it's a complete surprise to the Slack devs that people might join more than one team. There is nothing about Slack that's global, other than being able to log into multiple teams on one instance of the application.
I've been waiting for a global mute button since forever, but these guys just keep assuming we're all part of only one Slack team.
Talk about getting a stomachache from stuff other people eat. But, whatever :-)
The only way to change the password on 200 accounts is to change the password on 200 accounts.
Vote with your wallet, that's fine. My point is that it's stupid to place your emotional state on something you do not control.
The buyout is not good or bad, it just is. Don't get upset people, you couldn't prevent it before and you cannot undo it now.
Not trying to be an ass by saying that, but if you go to Europe claiming to be Canadian :-) and speaking English, you will not have a hard time pretty much anywhere, at least in Western EU.
(The reason is that I'm tired of the political crap going on here, it would be refreshing to see different political crap :-). Plus I absolutely love Europe. Would like to live there till I'm sick of it)
In pretty much all other fields, including non-startup tech jobs, degrees do matter a ton more.
There is no such thing as a "transfer degree". You either transfer or you do not.
Get an associates, the paper looks good, it's an ego boost, and it will make your family proud of you. After you get your bachelor's, the associate's will not matter for anything.
A community college is a great way to get into a far better school than you could have anyway, I'm living proof. This is because your GPA resets when you start junior college, and a 3.0 GPA on a junior college will get you into a much better school than a 3.7 would have in high school.
Just get in there, and don't screw up your grades. If you are not going to get a high grade in the class, drop it and then re-take it. It's a weasel thing to do, but it's better than getting a shitty grade in your record.
It's no big deal the situation you are in. Just work at it intelligently. You will actually save a ton of money than if you had gone to a 4-year college for all 4 (or 5 or 6) years from the beginning.
It might affect work visas as well (some countries give a lot of weight to a college degree when assigning a priority to your application).
Of course, to get stuff done you do not need a degree and examples abound about people who "made it" without a college degree. Granted, they learned everything on their own, so if you have a low motivation to learn stuff that's important in your field but boring to you (for example, algorithms and data structures), you might want to get through the degree just to force you to learn stuff.
For me, I'm in the US, where college degrees matter relatively little, specially in tech. Still, I can say without a doubt my CS degree has opened many doors for me, even a couple decades after having gotten it. Also I have had to fight far less to get good salary offers. Once people know I have a CS degree, we move onto the advanced stuff instead of them trying to see if I'm an idiot or not.
That's my $0.02, your mileage may vary.
I had a chuckle too about "malicious". A DDoS attack is a DDoS attack. It's like hearing about a "malicious stabbing."
But whatever, there are DDoS attacks every day on someone.
He should have either stressed he did not have inside knowledge and this was his personal opinion, or he should have said nothing. The problem with the first option is that he did have inside knowledge.
Put another way, if he had said something that had affected stock price, he would probably face criminal charges.
That's reason enough to shut the heck up, bite his lip, and let the internet be wrong. All of us with inside knowledge about our employers (specially if our employer is a public company) do that routinely.
I'd go for it if I was a freelancer.
That would be better than some rambling prose that says nothing.
What a non-statement. Not sure why it was published. Maybe because it's Friday and the author wanted to leave?
People want stuff they cannot afford, so they spend money they do not have, it costs them dearly. That's how the system works; not that I advocate it.
It takes considerable effort to get out of the cycle, especially for people in consumerist USA.
The way I look at it is: If they ask me for my social security number, then I am getting a loan, and so I do not go through with the transaction. For my prepaid phone I spent $250 for the phone, and I pay $19 monthly. No SSN required. For a phone plan, I would spend $0 (or whatever for a higher-end phone), sign a contract, provide my SSN, and pay monthly over at least 2 years.