gelasio

Sure, everybodys bias is painfully obvious here on HN.

But I don't think that negates the fact that to develop anything at all for OS X I have to buy a whole computer from Apple, since it's damn near impossible to get a stable OS X experience by running it in a VM or directly on non-Apple hardware. Furthermore, remotely accessing Xcode on a Mac from a non-Mac computer is really painful since the only option is VNC - the bottom of the barrel, lowest common denominator of remote screen sharing protocols.

Guard makes things less readable because it "hides" variable declarations. If you break it out onto it's own line I'm sure it would make things look downright ugly.

"Don't put multiple statements on a single line unless you have something to hide" - https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/CodingStyle

(If you disagree or if you think I said something wrong and my comment deserves to be hidden, I'd love to know why!)

Other projects have to do a lot of work to support OS X too. So I guess I still don't see your point. Electron, for instance, had to program an entirely different object model to represent OS X's kludgy global menu bar when every other OS has menus attached to application windows.

I can't believe your defending OS X though when Apple makes you buy a whole computer from them to use it...meanwhile I can run a 6 month trial of Windows (over and over again) on any virtual machine. Honestly, it's way more work to support OS X than Windows if you really bother to look at it.

"But they make little to no effort to help bridge the gap, they usually leave that to everyone else."

OK, but that's also where you're wrong, right there. In general, but also particularly for this exact issue - Microsoft considered attempting to fix the file path limit for the first release of Windows 10. Maybe you don't understand, but it's going to take a herculean effort to fix this. They want to do it and if you need proof of that I can find posts of them talking about what I just said.

So, are you of the opinion that OSS projects should never be built for any commercial, proprietary OS or just Windows (i.e. because it's not Unix)?

For instance - OS X window managers suck. Do you think that a project like Spectacle should have never been built because they're just picking up Apple's slack?

It sounds like you're getting annoyed that the devs of certain projects like Node.js have chosen to support an OS that you don't use without asking you about it first... If you're in control of the project - you have every right to ignore Windows users. If you're not in control, then you really have zero right to complain. Zero.

Devs certainly aren't forced to "pay the Windows tax" in any way. Plenty of OSS projects completely ignore Windows. I'm sure you're aware though that Windows has the majority market share of desktop operating systems. If your software is interesting to the vast, vast population of Windows users, you might get some requests to support Windows. And since it's not an outlier in the market, other desktop OSes should obviously strive to be more like Windows ;)