"can't write some class of software" is just wrong, is all
882 karma · joined May 25, 2014
I think the web with all its shortcomings is the best thing to happen to tech industry and I want it to succeed. That does NOT mean it should be used for everything.
"can't write some class of software" is just wrong, is all
Unsubstantiated claim of the year. "Everything there was to be discovered is already discovered".
Evolution succeeds once again.
It's doubly amazing that this happens while Win7 is still more than usable.
I'd never prefer one 'true' way (aka opinionated bs) to organic ecosystem competition.
But seeing sibling explanation being downvoted into oblivion makes me think no one is interested in discussing this anyway so why waste breath.
Do other jobs have such benefits? Remote work all over the globe for example? The fact that everyone needs IT these days and so you have tons of work? Nice comfy offices? Apples to oranges won't fly.
> And also what should you do?
Find a work-life balance instead of answering a fair question with a defensive silly question of your own (I ain't even a recruiter and that answer right there made me lol, imagine a guy having to listen to that defensive shit and still having to try and salvage a candidate because he may have strict job requirements). And by that balance I mean either work your ass off to produce quality code in your spare time and stand out among candidates or don't and someone else will stand out instead.
Also check out the irony with this 'my code' stuff too. That's exactly why you have to work ass off in spare time: because every employer goes 'quack! it's my code, don't show it to anyone' so you can't share it with another recruiter.
god I hope this is exaggerated lol.
Filthy recruiter, how can they even ask such a question. How dare they ask whether I make tech world better outside my job. Muh keeds, muh family.
> my code
The one that is built on titanic effort of others not all of which was compensated in any way at all?
They want an undo button? It's right under their nose: stop with the bullshit auto-update that re-enables itself, document all telemetry and make a big button to disable it.
But they don't do that, do they? Any idea why? Spoiler: it's all fake bs again, take one flashy but insignificant step forward and take 3 covert snake-like steps back.
> https://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/09/20/signs_deal_with_cas...
You just look at that shit. Look:
> We’re pleased to reach an agreement and to see continued recognition of the value of our patent portfolio, particularly as it relates to operating systems,
Nothing evil here, move along, lol. Fucking cockroaches. For a multi-billion OS giant you sure are afraid of something 'small' and produced by volunteers that gives users their freedom. What a pathetic display.
Who ever thought future progress can be sacrificed just so that some obscure website (obscure because it is no longer supported, people no longer care) can work for 22 years during which the world has changed so much that this website is probably no longer relevant under any objective measure.
I mean yes, maintain SOME backward compatibility but dragging bs like typeof null === 'object' all along is just nuts.
- It doesn't pull every 30 minutes, that's just wrong.
- It rings on all devices for me
- No teasing with social BS
- Button for screen sharing is one right-click away like it always was.
Take back your freedom from BS updates and you will be alright.