666 karma · joined December 6, 2017
> To conduct the CT scans, the large mass was evaluated by a third-party laboratory under NTSB supervision. This facility had a range of scanners with different power and energy levels and could scan large masses using a rotating table, avoiding the need to rotate the mass itself. Ultimately, the third-party laboratory attempted to image the large mass at a power as high as 320 kilovolts (kV). The scans conducted at 320 kV were not powerful enough to penetrate the object, and as a result, no internal structures or voids were visible, and no memory devices could be identified. The NTSB evaluated using another laboratory with higher power and energy CT scan devices, however, there was concern that increased CT scan energy could damage data stored on any surviving NVM chips. Consequently, higher-energy scans were not pursued.
I'm no expert, but remember reading about neutron imaging ([1]). I'm curious if that was deemed unfeasible, too expensive, or having little chance of success? From Wikipedia:
> X-rays are attenuated based on a material's density. Denser materials will stop more X-rays. With neutrons, a material's likelihood of attenuation of neutrons is not related to its density. Some light materials such as boron will absorb neutrons while hydrogen will generally scatter neutrons, and many commonly used metals allow most neutrons to pass through them.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron_imaging#Neutron_radiog...
Surely it will be possible to also store it on some government-issued, GCHQ-vetted digital device, and not rely on foreign companies (Google/Apple) and their locked-down mobile platforms?
https://astropolis.pl/topic/60163-wasp-10-b-w-pegazie-1270-m...
But yeah, first we'll go through a few (?) years of the self-defeating "ChatGPT does my homework" and the necessary adjustments of how schools/unis function.
TL;DR: VCRO is capable of imaging spy- and other classified US satellites. An automated filtering system (involves routing through some government processing facility) is in place to remove them from the freshly captured raw data used for the public transient phenomena alert service. 3 days later, unredacted data is made available (by then the elusive, variable-orbit assets are long gone.)
[1] https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2024/12/vera-rub...
https://app.astrobin.com/u/GreatAttractor?i=246828#gallery
Technically speaking, in the first half of the vid the incoming wavefronts are distorted (the Fried parameter r₀ is smaller than the telescope's diameter D) and do not focus to a clean, tight Airy pattern ([1]). In the second half, r₀ is above D and we're left with just some rubber-membrane distortion (the wavefronts are tilted this way and that, but remain mostly planar), which can be corrected in software.
1. Sprite-based -> 3D sandbox world (in my case: Stunts, F29 Retaliator, Gunship 2000, Wolfenstein 3D)
2. Hardware 3D rendering (I had the NVidia RIVA 128ZX)
3. Fast-paced real-time multiplayer (Delta Force: Black Hawk Down)
The 4th might be the usage of LLMs or similar technology for (mostly-)unattended content generation: NPC dialogue etc.
But FOR GOODNESS' SAKE, these dealings and bickering are supposed to happen behind closed doors! You give the public just the bland courtesies and assurances! The US president and vice president have come across as impulsive 4-year-olds throwing toys out of a sandbox.
I used to think that the novel "The 2020 Commission Report on the North Korean Nuclear Attacks Against the United States" ([1]), which ridicules Donald Trump quite a bit, was overdoing it for humor. Now I'm not so sure.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_2020_Commission_Report_on_...
- assemble a quite large interplanetary craft in orbit, with plenty of redundancy in HW and supplies
- drop 50 tons of cargo on Mars beforehand: food (and/or food-growing necessities - packaged soil, hydroponic equipment?), medical supplies, etc.; so that in case of problems, astronauts can survive on Mars for years if need be