269 karma · joined March 21, 2012
"Chrome does not support Java 7. Java 7 runs only on 64-bit browsers and Chrome is a 32-bit browser.
If you download Java 7, you will not be able to run Java content in Chrome and will need to use a 64-bit browser (such as Safari or Firefox) to run Java content within a browser. Additionally, installing Java 7 will disable the ability to use Apple Java 6 on your system."
So now it looks like I'll have to flip over to firefox if I want to use a site that requires the java plugin - kind of a nuisance.
You aren't allowed to:
"separate, isolate, or modify the audio or video components of any YouTube audiovisual content made available through the YouTube API;
promote separately the audio or video components of any YouTube audiovisual content made available through the YouTube API;
access any portion of any YouTube audiovisual content by any means other than use of a YouTube player or other video player expressly authorized by YouTube;"
https://developers.google.com/youtube/terms
Why wouldn't you read the API terms and comply with them before wasting all the development effort on something that will only get shut down? My advice is switch to the soundcloud API. http://developers.soundcloud.com/
When I am talking about partnering, I know building a site is only part of the battle, so in terms of equity it would be much more substantial than 5%.
I guess maybe a better question then, is how to get those early adopters?
these are all prohibited:
separate, isolate, or modify the audio or video components of any YouTube audiovisual content made available through the YouTube API;
promote separately the audio or video components of any YouTube audiovisual content made available through the YouTube API;
access any portion of any YouTube audiovisual content by any means other than use of a YouTube player or other video player expressly authorized by YouTube;
store copies of YouTube audiovisual content;
https://developers.google.com/youtube/terms
i dont work for google or youtube or anything, but it seems that it should be common sense to read the terms of an api before using it.
"A trial to decide on the eventual amount of damages owed by Limewire to thirteen record labels, including Warner and Sony Music, all of which are represented by the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA), started early in May and went on until on May 13, 2011, when Gorton agreed to pay the 13 record companies $105 million in an out-of-court settlement. " http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LimeWire
You can read their terms here: https://developers.google.com/youtube/terms
Specifically they say it is prohibited to "separate, isolate, or modify the audio or video components of any YouTube audiovisual content made available through the YouTube API;"
and it is prohibited to
"promote separately the audio or video components of any YouTube audiovisual content made available through the YouTube API;"
Like I said, I'm not a lawyer so my interpretation could be wrong.
I think in a nutshell they want you displaying the video because they have their own ads in the videos, and just streaming the audio cuts into their revenue.
Hate to be a wet blanket but I recently built a service using the YouTube API (http://chartbrain.com) and so the terms were fairly fresh in my mind.
I think other services that used only the audio from YouTube have run into trouble - songza comes to mind, they were one of the first sites to do it. http://www.wired.com/listening_post/2007/11/songza-turns-yo/