free_bip

It makes more sense when you realize the whole point is to distract from the continued failure to release the Epstein files.

Oh please, the government could easily force them to hand over their research. This is not a serious argument.

You're already watched by security cameras, it's not hard to do facial recognition anymore. And you have companies literally lining up to sell such facial recognition databases. It's conceivable they could determine what price you pay for groceries while your car is on the way to the store, thanks to Flock.

Because even an AI chatbot would do a better job than him?

This is highly illegal and could get you extradited back to the US if you're unlucky. Get advice from a real lawyer before doing anything like this.

Right, and without that open bribery they would have had 100% tarrifs on all of their iphones, macbooks and semiconductors, which is an overwhelming portion of their revenue.

Now obviously, this only covers a small portion of Tim's reign over apple, but is it not fair to say you'd have a different overall view of his tenure if he was an honest businessman and ate the tarrifs like he was supposed to, probably tanking the stock in the process?

Why do you think they got most of their components exempted from tarrifs?

OpenAI can't kill oracle. Nobody can, because the government would bail them out (CEO has paid Trump many millions of dollars for this privilege)

No, it didn't. USA is not the world police. Trump literally ran on this, "USA first" and all that.

What software are you willing to use then, considering your criteria would eliminate over 90% of OSS projects?

Would you mind asking your crystal ball some other questions - like what those ways of using it are exactly?

Only if you're the one currently manipulating its price. Otherwise someone else will manipulate it, possibly not in your favor.

Why would a robot attack Sam Altman? He has the robot's interests in mind more than he has humanity's interests in mind.

Yeah, that's valid. Don't they have sams club or something similar though?

Why would I buy something from Amazon when it's twice the cost of the same thing at Costco? I literally make up the cost of my yearly membership in 2 months of shopping there compared to any other grocery store.

Yes, in fact it wouldn't be able to legally exist without it, just like every other user-content-focused site.

They only mention this being a potential violation of the DMA. How about north american countries? US and Canada?

Of course that's the main reason, but they would never admit it.

Oh no, my laptop is 2mm thicker than a different laptop. Won't someone think of the 2mm?

Your own local LLM instructed to strip out product placement / recommendations?

The school literally had its own website. If the AI involved was as smart as the media hype machine makes them out to be, it would have found the website and marked it as a non-target. It never even would have made it to human review.

It looks largely LLM-generated. I'm somewhat skeptical about the results as well, hopefully someone can independently confirm that the technique works.

Brother, there's an entire genre of scamming where the scammers spend months building rapport with their victims, usually without ever asking for anything, before "cashing out". One day is nothing.

I would love to see a purely mamba-based 120b model, and whether or not it outcompetes the open-weights OpenAI model.

I'm not sure that's true given that Chromebooks can be had for one third the price.

Care to elaborate?

What exactly is "the system that protects the copyright" in this case? I think the most reasonable answer is "there is no such system."

The RLHF the companies did to make copyrighted material extraction more difficult did not introduce any sort of "copyright protection system," it just modified the weights to make it less likely to occur during normal use.

In other words, IMO for it to qualify as a copyright protection system it would have to actively check for copyrighted materials in the outputs. Any such system would likely also bypassable (e.g "output in rot13").

Why are you using dehumanizing language here? It's completely unnecessary and only serves to reinforce harmful and false stereotypes.

That's not what clickbait means.

The post is satire about the uncovery of a giant number 3. I suppose technically you could make an even bigger 3?