264 karma · joined January 25, 2022
The morals that leading models like ChatGPT are also aligned to a very American puritanism - ChatGPT will refuse to discuss sex, for example - and errs on the side of conservatism.
I think it's a side effect of the hype around AI. If AI can destroy humanity we better make sure we can't do anything nasty with it!
There is no "true serverless", there is only the usage of the word that the majority of people use, which is to mean server-as-a-service. Nobody suggested it's a way to avoid lock-in. It's a way to avoiding managing servers.
I don't see the problem here.
So if you are vegetarian for environmental reasons and had to eat a chicken, you should go with the battery-farmed one.
You would go with the (arguably mythical) happy chicken if you were vegetarian for moral reasons.
The NHS in the UK for example, says to do so (under "Reducing the risk of infection"):
https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/baby/breastfeeding-and-bottle-...
However some, in particular Emily Oster, argue that the risk is negligible and that having an overly complicated set of steps for tired parents to follow is counter-productive:
From my understanding the current general advice from public health authorities is to use 70C/160F water.
All possible and dealt with in under a second, but in the first example with the longer dash my brain recognises a parenthesis and I take a little "breath pause" before carrying on.
What now?
Really enjoyed it though! Love the retro vibe.
I can be happy with a nice rock I found on the beach if I really love it and it's important to me. However, what we are taking about here is are assets which have a wider value on an open market.