fknorangesite

> I'm often flexible in my beliefs ... but it can be dangerous if you don't place some principled boundaries on your self

As the saying goes: have an open mind, but not so open that your brain falls out.

Shopify is probably the most obvious example.

GSV The Banality of Gravitas

> if you've gotten to five, you're pushing it.

I agree; five is right out.

> ban posting that sort of information before a conviction.

A society that does not make arrest information public is one where it is very easy for someone to "disappear." That's the whole point.

> Search engines also curate ~~nowadays~~ and always have.

It's impossible not to. Even merely putting one specific search result above another because it's "more relevant" is the very act of curation, because you are inherently defining "relevance."

Grandparent [comment].

Yes, that's what they're saying: that the Jetsons completely missed this prediction.

Look further down in that article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miranda_warning#The_warnings

> anything you say can and will be used against you

which is a version that is much more common in fiction, and also what vintermann referenced.

> Slack is harming itself more by being stagnant.

For better or for worse, Slack has a huge UI overhaul right around the corner: https://slack.com/blog/productivity/a-redesigned-slack-built...

Ah, so we're submitting hateful transphobic screeds to HN, now?

Alice shows her project to Bob. Bob comes up with some mostly-unnecessary criticism of it as a way to shoehorn in a mention of his own project.

Do you feel all of linguistics is vapid? Is language not worth studying?

> yet every company I've worked at in the USA offered 15-20 days.

Then you've been very fortunate. This is not representative of many people - ask anyone working in a restaurant or retail how much paid vacation they get.

Unlike many countries, in the USA the legal minimum is zero.

I think you got confused about who you were replying to.

Right? I should at least have to say

> Computer. Lights.

And similarly in Canada as we are finding the unmarked graves of children at the former sites of the Residential "School" system.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canadian_Indian_residential_sc...

O'Connor was right.

I mostly like the moderation on this site, but I think you're missing the mark on this one.

The man - and the institution - facilitated and covered up the abuse and rape of countless children. Calling him a bastard seems pretty small potatoes for you to start clutching your pearls over.

> Why is this being downvoted?

Because there aren't only downsides.

> every “acid enthusiast” I met is heavily dysfunctional in some way.

This is just the Toupée Fallacy, though: if you met a perfectly functional "acid enthusiast", how would you even know?

It's not a new leak.

> zero risk?

That wasn't the question. The question was whether it's more risky than COVID.

> This sounds far more like a roommate situation than a semi-nuclear family.

Think again.

If there's someone in the house who downloads CP, do you think that person's kids don't know who it would be?

This YouTube video is linked from the README: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CPLdltN7wgE

Because it is interesting.

> Just leave the originals alone.

They did. It still exists for you. They haven't Ruined Your Childhood™.

Get a grip.

> It has taken almost a month to eliminate actual soft pornography from my timeline by reporting it. But still my timeline is full of sexually suggestive and offensive material.

Are you reporting it? Why? Just because you don't want to see it doesn't mean that no one does.

What you should be doing is a) not engaging; b) marking it as "not interested".

> quasi-pornographic Reels

Meh you're just telling on yourself, here. Mark them as not-interested. My feed is all scale models and noodle recipes.

But then turn around and ban actual, non-porn sex ed accounts.

Good first estimate! The next step is introspection:

> Why don't I know the answer to this already, even within an order of magnitude?