ffssffss

I'd rather imagine a world where Citizens United was decided differently and this donation wasn't legal in the first place.

What is the meaning of this language in the "5. Results" section of the paper:

Our main results are based on GOD which has no overlapping classes in the training and testing set. The training and testing were performed on the same subject, as individual differences remain a barrier when decoding at the group level [2, 16,21,32,34]. To compare with the literature, we report results from Subject 3 here and leave other subjects in the Appendix.

What training and testing was performed on the same subject? Are they reading peoples minds or just overfitting a model on purpose? This papers seems to suggest an unbelievably implausible result, with absolutely stunning, society shattering implications, so I'm assuming it's either wrong or misleading, given how casually it's tossed on arxiv...

The definition of leverage is the ratio of a company's debt to its equity. Being pressured to grow too fast by your investors because their model is for every invetment to either go light speed or bust is just a different thing. That is the source of the confusion.

AP is now reporting a "senior US intelligence official" confirmed it =/