351 karma · joined October 1, 2019
I think docker the company not succeeding as a unicorn has more to do with trying to position it as a unicorn than a viable business built upon something in that original offering
For the 737 Max, they were very late and had to react to Airbus much better neo offering, and didn't have the time and/or money and/or capabilities to develop a new airplane, so a lot of in the end deadly compromises had to be made to somehow bypass training and security certification as much as possible using the old airframe at low cost.
- Boeing had a pretty strong engineering driven culture for a long time
- In the 90s, McDonnell Douglas bought Boeing with Boeing's money and McDD management took over, which was a mostly Jack Welch inspired bunch of value extraction types
- Engineering culture started decaying, drastic cost cutting, outsourcing and value extraction started taking place, with Boeing spending up to 80% of free cash on stock buybacks instead of investments
- Dreamliner program started in the early 2000s, 737 MAX several years later
I think it boils down to the erosion of the company not having progressed as far when the Dreamliner was being designed
This isn't correct by my understanding - there's actually two separate things here:
- The company made their trains stop functioning after spending 10 days at competing maintenance locations, based on GPS
- In one firmware, they hardcoded to pretend a compressor failure a few days after the next scheduled maintenance for the train
However, based on your cliché populist statement of distrusting any media because it's biased, I don't see a point in continuing.
1. Hate crimes are hugely different from battery/assault, so I'm not sure how your reference adds anything 2. Police data is not a trustworthy source, as police is biased too. Just check some news articles about police refusing to even take in a report about hate crime, where this is more likely to happen, and consider what this means for the stats you're quoting
Do you have a source for this?
> Advertisers wanted bland stuff that appealed to everyone.
Do you have a source for this? From my point of view a larger audience will drive the price up so I fail to see a correlation. Also, a broader audience leads to less targeted audience, so that seems cost-ineffiecient
> It's the subscription model that drives partisanship.
Do you have a source for this?
> People want to pay to support stuff that they agree with.
Do you have a source for this?
You are framing a bouquet of personal opinions as facts here.
> The console will cost 9,980 yen before tax; at just under $80, this is in line with the pricing of earlier mini-consoles.
At the same time, on eBay the analogue pocket routinely sells for $700 - $1000, so it seems there's quite a gap in supply for this
From https://web.archive.org/web/20040908114732/http://www.sun.co...
I guess the marketing claims were true. I am completely mystified why this feature exists.
What I wonder is - is there any way out of this curse of growth with all the money spent into those inflated prices at this point that does not mean complete economic collapse?