fay59

It sounds like you can design a login provider around that: direct to login site with a return address, confirm with user they want to log in, post back to return address with token that allows site to query login provider.

I’m sorry. I really meant “in addition to the government”.

Choosing to be at the mercy of the people with the best opsec instead of the government sure is a take.

EDIT: I mean “in addition to the government”.

With “absolute free speech”, a couple of us could find your name and address, spread credible and damaging falsehoods about you, and there’s nothing you could do to stop us. And that’s not just in some online soapbox; we could call your employer, make police reports, put ads in newspapers, put posters on utility poles, tell your neighbours, tell the businesses that serve you, etc.

I mean, it’s easy to say that OO is useless when you come up with a code example that doesn’t use features unique (or uniquely convenient) to OO languages. Throw in some inheritance or interfaces and it’ll be very different.

Do you think that if FireEye shared with the public how they attributed it to Russia, Russia would make the same attributable mistakes again?

You can produce two signed binaries, one for <10.11 that is signed with a SHA-1 and one for newer systems that is signed with SHA-256. Your update framework would have to know which one to pull, but that seems surmountable.

What are the benefits of chacha20-poly1305 over what’s currently implemented?

Hacker News: implementing an incomplete subset of Web standards to focus on things that matter to everyone, like performance and privacy, is a great idea. Also Hacker News: fuck Safari.

The original Rosetta couldn’t do it, or couldn’t do some part of it. I remember because Sixtyforce couldn’t run. I believe that it could have to do with self-modifying code.