> what would make this actually useful for you?
A privacy policy that's at least as good as Vertex.ai at Google.
Otherwise it's a non-starter at any price.
5,482 karma · joined September 19, 2011
A privacy policy that's at least as good as Vertex.ai at Google.
Otherwise it's a non-starter at any price.
(Confirmation is faster than prediction.)
Many models architectures are specifically designed to make this efficient.
---
Separately, your statement is only true for the same gen hardware, interconnects, and quantization.
The same problem exists defining human intelligence, it's a problem with "intelligence" in general, artificial or not.
Your entire original complaint was that this doesn't happen. I agree. The difference is I don't think merely moving somewhere should give you political representation there, and the corresponding benefits you would get. You would need to gain citizenship.
"Paying taxes" has nothing to do with it. I pay taxes whenever I travel on anything I buy. I pay taxes when I export products. I don't magically get to vote or apply for social housing because of those taxes, because I'm not a citizen.
But I do have a place where I am a citizen, and if I'm upset about "my taxes" going to foreign political systems, get this, I can just choose to not pay them. No one is forcing me to travel or work in a foreign country or export products or pay taxes to people who don't represent me politically.
---
As to "anti-immigrant", my position is straightforward: citizens of Country A should not be treated as if they were citizens of Country B merely by voluntarily "paying taxes" to Country B, for goods, labor, visas, exports, or any other reason. They must actually be a citizen of a country to get the benefit of being a citizen of that country.
This is a rule that applies to every country and all people, whether an immigrant or not: you get the benefits of citizenship when you are a citizen, and not a day before.
That's pro-citizenship, not anti-immigrant. Hope that helps.
So did I. Being foreign, they can work at home and not pay into a system they have no part of. Problem solved.
By definition, outsiders don't have to pay into the system since they already have a gov't somewhere else that is dedicated to them, just like the Viennese do.
Driving involves danger to other. We restrict adults from doing things that are a danger to others, it has nothing to do with being "vulnerable."
It's interesting how few governments believe this. Your rulers know what's best for you, and it's not freedom.
You need a custom Matrix client to do that, which I built on top of the Rust crate.
But I didn't release any of it because MLS is exactly that + better (faster) crypto due to how key ratchets work for group members. So I added MLS' crypto to an existing chat implementation I had which already had all of the Matrix-style chat sync implemented, and dropped my Matrix client and backend. Haven't looked back.
Based on my inspection of the Rust crate [0] as of today, it does not. YMMV.
Separately, as you well know, Matrix has its own encryption (Olm, Megolm) that competes with MLS for group chat use-cases. Why you are acting like it doesn't is beyond me.
MLS is an IETF standard. The server is easy to write, and easy to make scalable (no complicated merge algorithm required, unlike Matrix). Finally, individual chatrooms scale to an order of magnitude larger size vs. Matrix.
MLS is superior in every way to Matrix as it exists today if you need to implement encrypted chat rooms for your app.
Source: Guy who has implemented both, including extending Matrix to scale the server to Twitter scale (by, in essence, making it working like MLS, only worse due to the merge algorithm).
Who knew that using Claude to introspect on itself was against the ToS?
Mostly Gemini Pro 2.5 (and now Gemini Pro 3) and mostly Clojure and/or Java, with some JavaScript/Python. I require Gemini's long context size because my approach leans heavily on in context learning to produce correct code.
I've recently found Claude Code with Opus 4.5 can relieve me of some of the "agent" stuff I've done, allowing the AI to work for 10-20 minutes at a time on its own. But for anything difficult, I still do it the old way, intervening every 1-3 minutes.
Each interaction with the AI costs at least a $1, usually more (except Claude Code, where I use the $200/month plan), so my workflow is not cheap. But it 100% works and I developed more high-quality code in 2025 than in any previous year.
Since no one has all six working geniuses, and you're only a genius at two, it takes a collection of people, proportional to the work that needs to be done, of each type.
I don't think so, but again, it's a nit.