629 karma · joined August 1, 2014
This gave me a chuckle. On of these is definitely _not_ like the others.
Depends, if your work schedule leaves you so drained that it leads to extreme burnout and eventual depression, along with a string of health issues, then it doesn't matter how much money you make, because spending it won't bring you the joy back, and you may fall into a shopping addiction in order to keep you stimulated. Sometimes I think of telling my boss that I don't want a raise, I want less hours at the same rate.
It's not like I don't buy things online, but I struggle to think of something I can't get somewhere else, be it computer accessories (any other online shop or directly from the retaler) or books (order it at a local book shop or buy from the publisher), which are actually the only physical items I order online.
The shopping experience on Amazon is meh, so I can't imagine that anyone enjoys using it for every day items, like groceries.
I guess it's similar to what you do here when you "move" comments from one submission to another. A downside is that it can be hard to know which comments come from which submission. Perhaps top-level comments need a small marker indicating which link they originally commented under?
They're incredibly popular here, and yes, all supermarkets will have a lock stand near the checkout area so you can leave them there and easily reach for them as you're bagging your groceries. They're also foldable and/or small enough to fit in almost any closet.
You can also use Pollen to write Latex! Before Quad (https://docs.racket-lang.org/quad/), a quick way to get a PDF output of your Pollen document would be to output Latex from Pollen, then use the resulting document to generate your PDF.
If only. Papers rarely describe their methods properly, and reproduction papers have a hard time being published, making it hard to justify the time it takes. If reproducibility was valued, things like retractionwatch wouldn't need to exist.
I can only see this as a negative, what's the use of automatically generated papers if not to flood the already over-strained volunteers that review papers at conferences? (mostly already-overworked PhD students.) If I wanted a glorified chatbot to spam me with made-up improvements, I'd ask it myself.
Edit: this Github Search Link is useful to find other forks: https://github.com/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=2022%2C+%5BMagnus...
The main problems with having a log is that it grows with every single change (how granular are your changes? with CRDTs, any mutation, no matter how small, is a change). Questions of data retention (is your protocol tolerant to missing log entries?) or data rewriting (if your log is a merkle tree, rewriting something in the past means rewriting all subsequent entries) are also open.
The post also mentions that the log entries could be CRDTs. But if that's so, then you don't need a log at all, since all the information you need to compute the minimal delta to sync between peers is inside the CRDT itself. For a good overview of how this could be done, see (specifically the "Calculating Diffs" section): https://ditto.live/blog/dittos-delta-state-crdts (disclaimer: I work at ditto)
Did you miss the graphs showing the same trend in the UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and the Nordic countries?