989 karma · joined June 21, 2014
https://www.interviewquery.com
https://enahs.github.io
https://playcrossle.com
Like i said before, this is wishful thinking, but it’s not for lack of resources.
Probably wishful thinking but would be great.
AOG (airplane on ground) is essentially a broken plane stuck at a gate getting fined massively by the airport because it is blocking a gate. In this situation, usually price elasticity of demand goes out the window with respect to airplane parts because what you'll pay in markup pales in comparison to what you'll pay in fines.
Is it more profitable to get new planes or run older ones into the ground? The answer to this question is beyond my depth.
Source: my first job out of school was SQL jockey for an airplane parts distributor running reports for the guys trying to predict which parts would be needed. The company had 4 guys and two vans on standby 24/7 to run parts to the airport. This was a very profitable business segment.
NYC would require a true level 5 autonomous vehicle and i'm not sure it's even possible to drive 100% legally at all times given variables like construction, pedestrians going the wrong way on one-ways on scooters, et al.
I hope they can figure it out and wish them good luck!
in the beginning, code up the product, even if it's not the best, get something that works.
once the product is in a usable state enough to gain revenue, use the cash to get more engineering manpower.
now that there are a few folks, code in tandem with engineers while managing team, tapering down coding as team grows.
now my day to day is probably 20% coding, 60% product/project management + QA, 20% recruiting/hiring