I have to wonder: before writing this essay, did pg read anything written by anyone on the opposite side of this case? For instance, this?
https://www.readfrontier.com/investigation/two-truths-and-a-...
If not, it seems like a pretty remarkable procedure to arrive at such a strong conclusion, with no other information besides a brief summary by advocates for the defense. Has pg ever served on a jury? If so, would he make his mind up this way?