863 karma · joined January 8, 2015
> Anyone want to buy some well-used CD burners?
CD burners that were used to burn OpenBSD CDs over the years? Well, that would be a nice collectors item :)
I paid $15,- on Ebay for the CPU with free shipping.
Those are very expensive, OP stated that his budget is $300, those are almost $600. I don't know any company apart from Minifree that sells those.
It's a T60 with upgraded CPU (T7600), second hand 60GB SATA II SSD, 3GB RAM (limited due to chipset bug), ExpressCard with USB 3.0 and a 9-cell battery which lasts for 1/2 hours.
I spend around $100 for this machine in total, only $25 for the T60 itself.
I'm not using this particular machine because the specs are so great, but because I found it on Ebay and it was painted yellow. It's such an awesome thing. It runs Debian with XFCE4 fine, but websites like Facebook in Firefox isn't that fast. For development purposes it's perfectly fine.
I'm thinking about upgrading this machine with a motherboard from a T60p with a FireGL GPU one day, but I have to research if that would work.
You could take the same route as I did, but if that's too much work I'd go for a X201 with SSD and 8GB RAM.
The Streisand VPN includes a Tor Bridge by default, so if you ever have problems with an advanced firewall that blocks most VPN protocols, Streisand with Tor is your friend.
Tor Bridges are also a nice playground for modern cryptography, they are working on PQ Crypto: https://gitweb.torproject.org/user/isis/torspec.git/plain/pr...
It's a bit over-the-top paronoid to expect firmware modifying software in GPU drivers, but I understand their point.
The sad thing is that ME isn't even developed by Intel, but a third party. They sublicense it to Intel. So even if Intel would be willing to distribute the source, they couln't.
Highly recommended read about x86 security: http://blog.invisiblethings.org/papers/2015/x86_harmful.pdf
The author of this paper is also the developer of Qubes OS. They recently added another requirement to laptops who are 'Qubes certified': they must run Coreboot. It's not Libreboot yet, but that is a huge leap forward for x86 security. Hopefully this will trigger vendors to make their hardware Coreboot compatibile. It won't do anything about Intel ME, but it is a step in the right direction.
I ordered a Thinkpad x200 to flash it with Libreboot last week, just to have at least one device without any malware (in RMS sense)
If you search you can probably find some more subreddits with less general content. And HN is of course a really great website for such discussions, with a lot of highly intelligent people that post quite lenghty comments. HN is probably my favorite website when it comes to discussions.
http://sockpuppet.org/blog/2015/01/15/against-dnssec/
I don't have a strong opinion on DNSSEC myself, but I agree with him that DANE is a bad replacement for standard TLS connections. DNSSEC is by far not the best security protocol ever designed, but it can protect to some threats, like cache poisoning.
Congrats Torvalds, thanks for changing the world!
As others replied, x509 would be even more correct, but SSL is completely incorrect, because that protocol is insecure and shouldn't be used. Using SSL suggest that the software supports that protocol, although it doesn't (as it should)
If you tunnel the DNS resposes over a TLS connection, then it would be secure. This has been specified in an RFC recently.
And about XLAT464: Apple could've just added that to iOS, instead of this. Google did the same a few years ago. If all the vendors would apply the same transition mechanism, that would make it a lot more easier for carries to deploy IPv6.
T-Mobile in the USA is currently using such a network, which is the best transition method in my opinion.