Potatoes also produce fruits that are similar to cherry tomatoes. They taste like gross tomatoes and are indeed poisonous in relatively small quantities.
407 karma · joined May 9, 2014
Potatoes also produce fruits that are similar to cherry tomatoes. They taste like gross tomatoes and are indeed poisonous in relatively small quantities.
It just seems like laws with the title ‘propagation of divisive concepts prohibited’ will evolve to an even expanding list of thought crime.
This isn’t a comment on how race should be treated and discussed in a classroom.
They have the ability to limit your use of their resources, which is well within their rights.
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2020/07/how-carlos-ghosn-esc...
>> B1: Too arbitrary. The shell’s virtue of limitless composition (G1) is also its vice: the shell can compose arbitrary commands written in arbitrary languages.
This is what I fundamentally love about the shell, and you can try to pry it from my cold, dead fingers
>> B3: Too obscure. The semantics of the shell and common commands are documented in 300pp of standardese [7].
With respect to Bash, I couldn't agree more about the 'standardese' gripe. Man pages would be so, so much more useful if they prioritized showing examples of common/useful ways to use the command. I would love a 'man --examples $COMMAND' feature. Does something like that exist?
The title, in a software sense, implies a binary/Byte interpretation of the word ‘bit’. I clicked through and there’s an accompanying picture of drill bits.
That’s illustrative of the overall level of coherence and clarity of argument this article provides.
echo "hello" | sha256sum
>> 5891b5b522d5df086d0ff0b110fbd9d21bb4fc7163af34d08286a2e846f6be03
echo "world" | sha256sum
>> e258d248fda94c63753607f7c4494ee0fcbe92f1a76bfdac795c9d84101eb317
But were I to briefly glance at a computer screen, I'd probably confuse these next two:
e258d248fda94c63753607f7c4494ee0fcbe92f1a76bfdac795c9d84101eb317
e258d248fda94c63753607f7c4494ee0fcbe92f1a76bfaac795c9d84101eb317
Seems like the only consensus is that the origin was (lab-leak || zoonotic). Given the unlikelihood of ever knowing the true origin story, future epidemic mitigation efforts should just assume both causes. History is rich with examples of both.
I have little doubt that it's happening, but the twitter link was not substantive in comparison to:
https://blog.robinhood.com/news/2021/1/28/keeping-customers-...
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-biden-pompeo/pompeo-m...
Twitter literally didn’t exist 15 years ago. How can a lack of access to Twitter be an an infringement on free speech then?
> Yeah...and the article in the op is saying we shouldn't rush to attribute excess deaths to the new vaccine.
That's NOT what the article is saying. Excess deaths are those beyond what are to be expected. The article specifically is saying not to attribute the many, many usually expected deaths to the vaccine.
The article's own words:
> And about 14,000 of that ten million will die, out of usual all-causes mortality.
I'm being glib, and share many of the author's frustrations with the state of things, but really the trends covered in the article have been happening for well over a decade. In that time Raspberry pi's have hit the market and the microcontroller market has never been better for hobbyists and professionals. Likewise with scientific computing frameworks like R and Python. The author even managed to get a personal website up for all of us to read. The options for personal computing are wide, wide open, even if some markets or products remain closed and proprietary and tough to hack.
Also,
> I suppose one can argue that if we all have nothing but dumb terminals running software from a ROM (which cannot be written to), then no malware can get onto our computers. But, do we want to go back to the dumb terminal days of the 1980's? Is this the "modern" operating system that we want?
For certain stuff like online banking, yes.
Also, the website says you get about 192 bits of entropy. It's been a while since I did any combinatorics. It seems you should have 25! * ((6 * 4) ^ 25) possible dice rolls. 25! combinations of dice placement times (6 face up possibilities * 4 rotational possibilities) for 25 dice.
Python gives:
import math math.factorial(25) * (6 * 4)^25
496508538648719564809316402287439226010265627463254016000000
2^196
100433627766186892221372630771322662657637687111424552206336
I believe you're right about that. The cynic in me thinks Georgia is only 'reopening' to avoid paying more unemployment. Maybe it's my own Swedish ancestry that compels me to want an strong social safety net and a softer lockdown?
Here in California, our governor has declared that we will do this indefinitely (!) until six criteria are met. Well, I hope they have some really concrete plans to meet them, because I haven't seen any such plans presented to the public. The absolute devastation we are doing to the livelihoods of so many is staggering. What will happen when the tax revenues run dry and the tax base has been reduced by some huge percentage? Coronavirus will still be around when that happens.
The virus is here, and will not be eradicated. Society cannot hibernate like this sustainably, certainly not until a vaccine arrives. I'm all about masks in public, social distancing rules, bans of large gatherings, and lots of resources directed to protecting vulnerable populations. But I'm afraid and convinced that the stay-at-home orders will do far far greater damage to society as a whole than the virus would/will under a more targeted mitigation scheme.
Maybe my fears are overblown because of the recent hit to my mental and physical health. My gym was declared illegal, as was access to all parks in Los Angeles, as was my ability to work in an isolated office without a needy toddler in the room.
We know the virus will not be suppressed as SARS or MERS were; this coronavirus is basically everywhere and spreading. I can't see how mitigation isn't the only option after a month or two. From the very beginning the whole point of social distancing has been to flatten the curve so hospitals can operate effectively.
On the other hand, having tests so widely available that groups (probably VIP groups to begin with, pending greater availability) can all get tested before banding together to do business would be beneficial. For example, I wonder if the motion picture industry will do this for film shoots, where basically a skeleton crew all gets together for a camp and have no contact beyond each other for the during of work.
There is a consensus among biologists that the Act has been successful to a significant extent. Barring cost consideration at any level does seem unreasonable, but cost consideration can lead to really perverse arguments; more dollars can be had by killing and harvesting and elephant that not, so therefore...etc.
The existence of other methods of conservation beyond this legislation doesn't make for a compelling argument to weaken it, nor does the fact that some people will prematurely harvest timber before endangered birds move in.