dsp1234

1.) LastPass login page hashes MasterPassword on the login page to produce a hash

2.) Hash is sent to the forums, and is checked against the same hash as the vault system

3.) Hash is confirmed, and you're logged in.

1.) Later hash is grabbed by an attacker.

2.) Attacker sends the hash to get the encrypted vault

3.) Attacker gets the encrypted vault

4.) Attacker is sad, because they don't have the MasterPassword, and thus have no access to all your passwords

Note that I'm not saying that they are awesome, and/or are doing the above. But it's not immediately obvious that a MasterPassword can't hash a forum login and a vault request at the same time. I mean, that's literally what the "MasterPassword never leaves the client" is supposed to mean.

[0] - https://lastpass.com/support.php?cmd=showfaq&id=6926

[0] - http://www.oregon.gov/boli/TA/Pages/Equal%20Pay%20Law.aspx

"Effective October 6, 2017 employers are prohibited from seeking the pay history of an applicant or employee from the applicant or employee or a current or former employer of the applicant or employee before the employer makes an offer of employment to the prospective employee that includes an amount of compensation;"

[0] - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7232042

[1] - http://akaros.cs.berkeley.edu/files/Plan9License

The President is a person, not a god. If they want to use a private platform to speak, then they have to accept that platform's rules, just like anyone else. If they don't like that platform's policy, then they can use any other platform in the world.

ES8[0]

Model X[1]

Comparing these two, the ES8 is bit blockier like the current set of crossovers. Whereas the Model X has the body shaping of a really big sedan. Neither have the 100% of the classic SUV look, but both have 5 seats and hatchback with a dedicated cargo area. Neither is like the Model 3, which is a sedan with a normal trunk.

[0] - https://www.nio.io/prod/s3fs-public/styles/scale_width_3840/...

[1] - https://www.tesla.com/sites/default/files/images/model-x/sec...

1.) Transparency. Fixed and mobile broadband providers must disclose the network management practices, performance characteristics, and terms and conditions of their broadband services

2.) No blocking. Fixed broadband providers may not block lawful content, applications, services, or non-harmful devices; mobile broadband providers may not block lawful websites, or block applications that compete with their voice or video telephony services.

3.) No unreasonable discrimination. Fixed broadband providers may not unreasonably discriminate in transmitting lawful network traffic.

In 2014, in Verizon vs. the FCC[1], the appeals court struck down the No blocking and No unreasonable discrimination sections of the Open Internet Order. The court at the time noted that as long as broadband providers were considered under Title I, those sections could not apply to them. However, the court also noted that, in general, the FCC did have the power to enforce the Open Internet Order using Title II, and that the FCC had the ability to reclassify the ISPs under Title II.

Thus in 2015, the FCC reclassified broadband providers under Title II, thus making the No blocking and No unreasonable discrimination sections apply to them once again.

The history goes:

2010-2014: Transparency, No blocking, No unreasonable discrimination

2014-2015: Transparency, blocking ok, unreasonable discrimination ok

2015-now: Transparency, No blocking, No unreasonable discrimination

What the FCC wants to do now is to repeal the action taken to classify broadband providers under Title II, and move them back to Title I. This would again eliminate the ability of the FCC to enforce the Open Internet Order's No Blocking and No Unreasonable Discrimination sections.

[0] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FCC_Open_Internet_Order_2010

[1] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Verizon_Communications_Inc._v....

This is patently incorrect. The Open Internet Order of 2010 established a set of rules based around 3 concepts[0]:

1.) Transparency. Fixed and mobile broadband providers must disclose the network management practices, performance characteristics, and terms and conditions of their broadband services

2.) No blocking. Fixed broadband providers may not block lawful content, applications, services, or non-harmful devices; mobile broadband providers may not block lawful websites, or block applications that compete with their voice or video telephony services.

3.) No unreasonable discrimination. Fixed broadband providers may not unreasonably discriminate in transmitting lawful network traffic.

From 2010 until 2014, that was Net Neutrality. In 2014, in Verizon vs. the FCC[1], the appeals court struck down the No blocking and No unreasonable discrimination sections of the Open Internet Order. The court at the time noted that as long as ISPs were considered under Title I, those sections could not apply to them. However, the court also noted that, in general, the FCC did have the power to enforce the Open Internet Order using Title II, and that the FCC had the ability to reclassify the ISPs under Title II.

Thus in 2015, the FCC reclassified broadband providers under Title II, thus making the No blocking and No unreasonable discrimination sections apply to them once again.

The history goes:

2010-2014: Transparency, No blocking, No unreasonable discrimination

2014-2015: Transparency, blocking ok, unreasonable discrimination ok

2015-now: Transparency, No blocking, No unreasonable discrimination

What the FCC wants to do now is to repeal the action taken to classify broadband providers under Title II, and move them back to Title I. This would again eliminate the ability of the FCC to enforce the Open Internet Order's No Blocking and No Unreasonable Discrimination sections.

If you believe that Net Neutrality is something that the FCC made up in 2015 and that for 25 years the internet blossomed without net neutrality rules in place, then you are believing an obvious, and easily researched lie.

[0] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FCC_Open_Internet_Order_2010

[1] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Verizon_Communications_Inc._v....

That's basically what this is:

https://www.star-registration.com/

Boss: Rushes in and shouts, "Our production systems all went down when you pushed the latest code. WTF DID YOU DO!"

Me: Oh, I just deleted all of the dead code that had no references. That's great right? @olavk said it was easy.

Boss: You're an idiot. We use an on demand assembly loading system! You just wiped out a quarter of our code base, so the rest is failing due those missing assemblies. FIX IT NOW!

Note that the 'certain point' here is a practical limit of time/efficiency. In terms of computability, anything that can be computed on a quantum computer can be computed on a classical computer with exponential slowdown. It's the exponential slowdown that results in the practical limit.

Let's be a bit realistic. It's a 5 qubit processor. I'm not sure how excited the general population were when the first 5 bit processor was available. There is still a ways to go before actually useful quantum computers are generally available.

"You have access to one now with the Quantum Experience. It is small at the moment, with a five-qubit processor, but it is a work-in-progress that we are continually improving."[0]

[0] - https://quantumexperience.ng.bluemix.net/qx/tutorial?section...

"an undergraduate degree in computer science or related field"[0]

[0] - https://www.omscs.gatech.edu/program-info/admission-criteria

So unless that other field is Math or computer-related, then that's not really going to work, which is why I specifically mentioned "another field".

[0] - https://www.omscs.gatech.edu/program-info/admission-criteria

If you already have a BS in computer science or a related field, then see this comment[1]

[0] - http://ecampus.oregonstate.edu/online-degrees/undergraduate/...

[1] - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15899756

'Fake it til you make it' is about getting access to opportunities you wouldn't generally have otherwise. It's not a learning strategy, so it's not surprising that it's not an effective learning strategy.

Q: How do we reconcile on the one hand farmers by trade leaving and wannabe farmers wanting to join a farm life?

A: "people who want to do x and have money can end up in a better spot than people who inherited x and have less money?"

"Solo drivers, who before were barred from I-66 during rush hour, can use the lanes if they pay. That includes drivers of hybrid vehicles, which are no longer exempt. Motorcycles and vehicles carrying two or more people have free use of the lanes."

This is a new toll for allowing non-HOV drivers to use the HOV express lane.

Note that 'Arbitrary or capricious' is a legal standard of review for a government agency's decisions[0].

"In administrative law, a government agency's resolution of a question of fact, when decided pursuant to an informal rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), is reviewed on the arbitrary and capricious standard. Arbitrary and capricious is a legal ruling where in an appellate court determines that a previous ruling is invalid because it was made on unreasonable grounds or without any proper consideration of circumstances. This is an extremely deferential standard."

It's a pretty low bar, but it exists.

[0] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_of_review#Arbitrary_a...

I don't

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fraud

"Although elements may vary by jurisdiction and the specific allegations made by a plaintiff who files a lawsuit that alleged fraud, typical elements of a fraud case in the United States are that:

1.) somebody misrepresents a material fact in order to obtain action or forbearance by another person,

2.) the other person relies upon the misrepresentation, and

3.) the other person suffers injury as a result of the act or forbearance taken in reliance upon the misrepresentation."

Example lie:

I'm CCNA certified.

1.) Yes

2.) Yes (I'm hired)

3.) The company loses a government contract after finding out that I'm not actually CCNA certified, and the bid required all engineers on the project are CCNA certified (alternately, I completely screw up the routers and take the companies infrastructure out of the global routing tables)

Basically, if the company relies on the lie to hire you, and then later suffers an injury from that lie, then a fraud has been committed.

Note that it works both ways[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Employment_fraud]

After official complaints lodged with the FCC. Also, this was during the time period of the 2010 open internet order[0] and the 2014 court case[1], where ISPs and the FCC thought that the FCC had the authority to enforce "no blocking" violations.

So, saying "without Net Neutrality rules in place" is incorrect.

[0] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FCC_Open_Internet_Order_2010

[1] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Verizon_Communications_Inc._v....

Is this different than any other field? I was under the impression that most BS programs do not require novel research. That doesn't come until post graduate courses.

I don't expect (or want) the post office to open my letter, read it, and decide to charge an increased fee because I mention it.

I don't expect (or want) the post office to open the reply letter, and add an advertisement for the new government owned camping that just opened.