It's just effective linguistics and speech; what people have called "soft skills" forever is now, obviously, trying to be a science for some reason.
3,995 karma · joined June 10, 2011
Feel free to contact me about any of the above at andrew@indentlabs.com (writing) or dru@chromagolem.com (gaming).
It's just effective linguistics and speech; what people have called "soft skills" forever is now, obviously, trying to be a science for some reason.
Is there a way to handle "locking down" things with MCP? It seems like a potential opportunity for freemium services if they have a mechanism for authentication and telling the MCP caller "this user has access to these tools, but not _these_ yet".
It'll lower the barrier of entry (and therefore the quality floor before people feel comfortable sharing something "they made" if they can deflect with an easy "the AI made this" versus "I put XY0 hours into this"), but it'll also empower people who wouldn't otherwise even try to create new things and, presumably, follow their passion to learn and do more.
Even this article uses the phrase 8 times (which is huge repetition for anything this short), not to mention hoisting it up into the title.
Was there some viral post that specifically called it sycophantic that people latched onto? People were already describing it this way when sama tweeted about it (also using the term again).
According to Google Trends, "sycophancy"/"syncophant" searches (normally entirely irrelevant) suddenly topped search trends at a sudden 120x interest (with the largest percentage of queries just asking for it's definition, so I wouldn't say the word is commonly known/used).
Why has "sycophanty" basically become the defacto go-to for describing this style all the sudden?
(I didn't know what UDDI was.)
Obviously these tools don't do everything necessary to make great music, but the barrier of entry to making music is being lowered, and the quality floor is being raised -- and that'll result in a lot more would-be "musicians"[0] creating music that wouldn't otherwise exist[1].
[0] I leave the argument of whether these generative musicians count as "real" musicians to the Scotsmen in the audience.
[1] Bonus question: does art still hold value if no one sees it?
Assumedly, a paid version would exclude some features that Mozilla is otherwise monetizing through (like selling your data). This doesn't seem like sales "on top of" what they're already earning, but rather an alternative that replaces (at least some of) existing monetization routes.
Would you pay a one-time $10 for a lifetime Firefox license? $100? $1,000? $10,000?
I don't usually have my phone on me, but even if I did I need to at least unlock it to enable voice commands, which instantly kills any notion of it being truly hands-free.
Also, thinking about building a catio for my cat.
Seeing awesome feedback from players on our demos (and seeing an insane amount of stickiness from players playing even small demos built around generative AI mechanics). Raising now. Hiring soon to move faster. Feel free to reach out - dru@chromagolem.com
For anyone who hasn't seen it: you're in for a wild ride. Don't look up spoilers.