drchickensalad

Dynamic subdomains

How is that so?

It's very simply provable that there exist configurations you must guess in, even if weighted.

For things that are DOS-sensitive

Thank you.

These are probably my top shows of all time. I love the past few years just for this. Unfortunately with all these revolutionary shows coming out constantly people think you're just recommending everything you see :P

Roslyn is built for incomplete/flawed code

Know anything else that actually lists all that? I'd love to research each thing on its own independently but it's so hard to come up with the list without already knowing

Much, much less powerful fotms of them.

Why not cat > quinedb ?

I see you haven't abused multicursors.

I don't know where this 80/90 wpm limit is coming from but on a $5 keyboard many, many developers type 120 comfortably.

Cleveland's doing pretty well, but I'm biased.

Is this in programming pearls? Otherwise where?

Generally yes, specialized no.

Personally I say "9-5" a lot because it's a saying even though I'm 9-6.

Why is the trust increasingly hard to find?

Why does it act like this?

JSON object properties are unordered per the spec. This is not portable.

There are a ton of folks using f# out there? Would be nice to hear about them.

Care to go in-depth about the ramifications?

This is literally every ecosystem except classical c and c++.

However, rust would be relatively well-suited for a "dirty quick scripting task". You could make a more traditional wrapper for the operations you like to use that assumes these rare edge cases don't happen, and panic otherwise.

This is sort of rust's philosophy; being explicit. Rust has no problem with failing, it just has a problem with failing without you telling it to. If you write a wrapper that implies you are willing to fail on these cases, then you're being explicit by choosing to use these functions instead :)

Are there any good approaches for doing this without a specific framework?