dnnddidiej

If they even controlled the name the "joke" could have been done months earlier and meant bomb as in excellent.

Better to scan baggage for the actual, ya know, bombs. Fine people joking about bombs verbally or written sure.

Can be done on a claude pro. But if you are low on tokens then yeah probably stick to more of a non-thinking copilot type arrangement (which is fine!)

That sounds too extreme. I like Australia where states (ok much less populated than US states!) have certain building powers esp. to build rail infra but local can manage planning rules pertaining to an area but within a state level framework.

Oh this is 101. Anyone not doing this? If not do it now!

Dealing with a lot of traffic for a small team isn't hard in itself. If it is easy to parallelise you just need to horizontally scale. And most concerns can be added as sidecars or middleware. Rate limits, auth, etc. Basically this is a kubernetes cluster. For a 3 person startup hard. For 50 pretty managable.

Well yeah if they route most of the worlds tokens easily. What if we get to a point where the 5% is paid by the supplier and they take over more of the infra /routing side that they do. Lots of ways it could be a 10B company.

I make of it they are good at riding hype cycles

Trigger warning: animated insect crawls on screen.

How does it compare to multifocal contact lenses?

Boots. Licking boots.

Oh no not Material Design.

One idea is if they had a monocrome design from say the 50's use that. Or get a true artist to come up with something.

It is not necessarily bad if people hired cannot make it through. Reasons:

1. Standards got higher. Luckily if you got in early and proved yourself you are OK. But doesn't mean you would pass the current interview.

2. A marathon runner (with rare exceptions) can't run a marathon on a random day. They train for a specific date. Same with interview prep.

Seems a bit detached from the real world.

If I am doing a 6 month contract which is what he is proposing then yeah I want a great day rate and to earn 12 months salary in those 6.

It basically means I invest in a company that doesn't believe in me and probably wont try to help me succeed.

Also mortgages, car loans, life and health insurance etc. are harder to get on a short contract.

Hiring is broken (maybe) but 6 month paid interviews are not the solution.

Or makes ROTW more resiliant. I sped up my solar, battery and EV buy because of this for example.

The panels will land in ROTW.

They had a chance to embrace the black/white medium for somethink striking and attention grabbing but looks like a bad photocopy of the original packaging.

Butchering the Beatles song again.

Europe is why you have CCPA

I sort of make an exception for that popup. I.e. I don't mind seeing it. It's the tax to get good free content.

Medium forcing you to log in is too much tho.

Not everyone has the time or energy to do it. I estimate 10-20 hrs of chores a week for 2 adults 2 kids. Having cleaners is a nice touch when both parents work.

I feel like a self host will be too expensive for most (like self hosting frontier models at a decent speed)

That sounds off intuitively. The lowest earners are the base making higher earner possible both through their labour and consumption.

I think those are solvable problems. E.g. wrap mcp in skill or seperate forked (non context eating) call to smaller model to ask which mcps are applicable. Iet probably does this. Honestly I have not had issues with MCPs where I felt compelled to debug them.

MCPs are very useful when you don't have a CLI or you do but the MCP can handle auth like a proxy to something (e.g. Splunk). Or just for the USB-C analogy she gave.

It is open source. Just clone and ignore drama.

Doubly so with CS in the mix. IMO.

Oh my opsec is good but buttsec needs improvement.

This is the much reveered capitalism we love. Atlas cheered!

But it is then a greater fool "investment" unlike stocks.

You need socialism. That is not a snark. I am serious. It is getting rarer in the world. Even the "left" is very capitalist.

Warming it up. For the eventual electron app it'll be running.

> Perhaps what you want is a container which adheres to monad laws capable of abstracting exceptions

That is what I meant. Struggling to picture what the other "nonsensical" thing is.