The professional guilds are sounding the alarms, because there aren’t enough translators qualifying.
767 karma · joined July 30, 2015
my hn username [at] jyl [dot] liThe professional guilds are sounding the alarms, because there aren’t enough translators qualifying.
But especially nonsense like ”allows the Oura Ring to maintain its circular form as well as distribute heat” is what you get when you RLHF your chat bot for lazy students cheating on homework.
[the famous sculptor Toma Rosandić] named this composition of bronze horses and their tamers “Black horses at play, and with them great heroes”, saying that the horses represent strength, and men tame and control that strength.
For instance, say you are a woman with a lookalike celebrity, someone who is a very close match in hair colour, facial structure, skin tone and body proportions. You would like to browse outfits worn by other celebrities (presumably put together by professional stylists) that look exactly like her. You ask an LLM to list celebrities that look like celebrity X, to then look up outfit inspiration.
No matter how long the list, no matter how detailed the prompt in the features that must be matched, no matter how many rounds you do, the results will be completely unusable, because broad language dominates more specific language in the corpus.
The LLM cannot adequately model these facets, because language is in practice too imprecise, as currently used by people.
To dissect just one such facet, the LLM response will list dozens of people who may share a broad category (red hair), with complete disregard to the exact shade of red, whether or not the hair is dyed and whether or not it is indeed natural hair or a wig.
The number of listicles clustering these actresses together as redheads will dominate anything with more specific qualifiers, like ’strawberry blonde’ (which in general counts as red hair), ’undyed hair’ (which in fact tends to increase the proportion of dyed hair results, because that’s how linguistic vector similarity works sometimes) and ’natural’ (which again seems to translate into ’the most natural looking unnatural’, because that’s how language tends to be used).
https://www.google.com/search?q=ed+sheeran+graham+norton+bad...
There’s been a hypothesis floating around that I find appealing. Seemingly you can identify two distinct groups of experienced engineers. Manager, delegator, or team lead style senior engineers are broadly pro-AI. The craftsman, wizard, artist, IC style senior engineers are broadly anti-AI.
But coming back to architects, or most professional services and academia to be honest, I do think the term vibe architect as you define it is exactly how the industry works. An underclass of underpaid interns and juniors do the work, hoping to climb higher and position themselves towards the top of the ponzi-like pyramid scheme.
Grok and Deepmind IIRC didn’t require tricks.
So there is a plethora of companies happily dumping investor money into paid customer acquisition.
Blue Apron was a classic example of borderline fraudulent growth metrics and a cash grab IPO before the customer acquisition funnel collapsed.
And even with a narrower definition of stealing, Microsoft’s ability to share your code with US government agencies is a common and very legitimate worry in plenty of threat model scenarios.
I dabble in furniture, which means I’m looking at baltic birch plywood, at about 40 euros per square meter of 15mm 11-ply sheets. At that pricepoint I might as well buy actual hardwood lumber.