369 karma · joined February 1, 2016
> using the website to display anti-black ideology and actively plan rallies to remove my rights.
When it's not a crime and it's completely based on your subjective view: you're kidding yourself if you think that process is going to be a just measure. Likely, it's just going to be a free for all, whoever gets offended at what.
Let me add another colleague to your mix.
Asian guy: I don't agree on these statements. I'm quitting if we remove this content.
You see where this is going?
If you want to sway people's opinion from results that match their demographic and search behaviour then you better pay for it because that's an AD - no definite representation of truth or relevancy.
If you really want to provide the most relevant result for those queries, produce the content and make it trusted enough for it to rank first. If you can't then you are not relevant.
Google works on trust and relevancy (government links mean a lot for example). There's no devil behind the screen deciding to rank neo Nazi material at Google.
android.permission.BRICK'
I hope that doesn't do what I think it does...It enforces a set of rules to accelerate web pages. These rules can be used to validate your pages.
Not exactly. Those are Chinese characters and Chinese meanings. The article does not teach anything exclusivly Japanese. For anyone who was not familiar, they would go around with the impression that these characters really originate from Japan. You can imagine how the Chinese people or people who study Chinese would feel being shown this cool new way to learn "Japanese".