277 karma · joined May 15, 2020
We don’t fully understand most disease processes, even those for which we have some effective treatments.
I don’t think lumping disparates diseases together simply on the axis of “understanding of disease process” is terribly useful.
Well in a thread about the re-emerging dominance of idiocy in silicon valley, consider it more supporting evidence.
You have incorrect information. A an abridged or modernized version of the oath is still taken upon graduation of most American MD schools.
Do you have a reference to the history of key combos like ctrl f, b, n, p and a and e? Those are typically referred to as emacs style navigation and I am genuinely unaware of history of those as common tty control codes outside of emacs for cursor movement. They weren’t dec vt control codes. Ctrl-U was though and even has ASCII assignment as “NAK”. Ctrl-H and C are similar.. but people don’t typically refer to those as “emacs” keys.
Regardless of any minor variability in metabolism, you literally cannot get fat from things you don’t put in. This is like high school or middle school physics. This is by far the biggest factor in obesity (consumption).. such that everything else is essentially irrelevant. People with actual metabolism disorders either die or require replacement of enzymes, whether that’s type 1 diabetes or the rarer metabolism disorders.
If you eat high volume foods with calories at or below what you’re expending, you will not get fat, full stop. Starving people aren’t fat.
There are of course behavioral differences that dictate consumption, some of which are genetically influenced, but metabolism has not much to do with it.
Having outsized expectations of children is often a recipe for resentment. Children don’t have tendency to evolve the way you plan before they are born.
Buying a house just to live in is enough for most people.
RCA basically set up an unworkable scenario and management did not heed the sunk cost fallacy to realize they were down the garden path. A stylus based cheaply made consumer electronic device with the technology at the time was pretty much impossible (and then of course by the time tech had advanced a stylus based system was totally moot). You could have hired manhattan project people and it wouldn’t have changed the physical/economic realities of what they were trying to do.
COVID has probably made a measurable impact, but it’s very easy to measure small effects too. Whether much has changed long term, I am doubtful.
Pneumonia is a diagnosis (well, class of), not a symptom nor a sign, which are distinct terms of art. You can have pneumonia that shows up on a chest X-ray (a sign) without any symptoms.
A better example might be high blood pressure, which many people understand can be silent/asymptomatic for years but is easily measurable.
Point still stands, symptoms are noticeable and reportable by the patient. If covid gives you pneumonia you may still be asymptomatic.
This is like telling you to not use a lock if you have an alarm.
If the attacker has done this, they might as well just hide the camera somewhere else.
In reality it was a bit of a mixed bag.. and to some of us that remember the hype from 30 years ago it comes across as over promising and underdelivering.
That isn’t to say that the technology isn’t incredible, I don’t mean to dump on it. But overpromising is sort of the status quo for tech.
Basically what I’m saying is that I’ve never seen any substantial rewrite of decent C++ code into Java perform better, even if jitting has benefits on a small scale, it’s not substantial enough to overcome other overheads in managed languages.
Interestingly in 30 years I have not once heard of a case where this theoretical benefit has manifested as a clear advantage in any real world application when looking at the system as a whole... amdahls law and all that.
You can always hand tune the 1-10% hotspots for reasonable cost most of the time, and even static tools can do PGO which generally gets you where JIT would anyway.
There are other forces at work.
For instance on my primary workstation after a period of time from cold boot, pretty much everything is sitting comfortably in 32 GB of memory. A lot of time is more due to the
1) sheer volume of crap that has to be shuttled in memory, because memory accesses still aren’t free 2) there’s a surprising amount of repetitive CPU intensive tasks just to get a program started up on merely bookkeeping tasks like linking, conversion, parsing.
In addition to all the built in latencies already mentioned.
To prove this you can setup a system using a RAM disk and notice that responsiveness is often still subpar.
In addition to this being in the context of air freight of which passenger..Not a whole lot of global freight involves rail or road only.
Not nonsense..
Passenger planes carried close to half of all air freight. And additionally while air freight only accounts for a small percentage of freight by weight, it carries a tremendous proportion by value.
It’s also telling that so much of this “objective” user experience narrative apparently depends on immediate and gratuitous condescension and hostility towards your users.
You sound like a complete asshole. You’re not better than everyone that disagrees with you. Try to do better.
Language is a lot more nuanced than a freshman philosophy major’s Logic 101 textbook.