deiznof

Right, especially considering the HBGary conspiracy that got revealed years ago against Wikileaks.

Australia just released a statement that they will continue to offer general consul services, and that's it.

Too little too late there, Australia.

This lie that Wikileaks never published that stuff needs to die.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2010/dec/01/wikileaks-cabl...

You're being disingenuous now. The core focus of this document is in regards to things that any other individual could justifiably sue for libel and defamation, but because this is a low point in Assange's image, we just laugh at him, which is ironic, considering his image itself has been damaged by these false claims.

>2. There is an entry in the guestbook for him, it doesn't come up when you ctrl-f because they misspelled his name, it appears as "Paul Manaford".

No, that was a "separate internal document" that claimed that, it wasn't in the guest logs.

As far as the photo, I don't recall anyone saying there was a photo, only that a witness claims they saw Manafort.

There's been a smear campaign for ages. The HB Gary/Palantir stuff was just the tip of the iceburg it seems.

This is what I'm wondering as well. Is Assange just supposed to roll over and not defend himself? It seems like no matter what he does people just mock him. There have been lots of confirmed fake stories about Wikileaks over the years, what is the "proper" way for him to act when trying to debunk them?

He would have to be referring to anti-Trump people within the FBI (not necessarily the entire FBI working together).

I don't really know what else it would mean.