169 karma · joined May 17, 2016
Everyone is whining about cost but ignoring the fact that someone is trying to innovate in this space. Who cares what it costs. They're pushing something out, and eventually if Apple and other major manufacturers offer low power displays, people will appreciate the option.
Rule of law being the key part. The U.S. has no rule of law, and our legal system doesn't punish those in power or those with money. For some relevant reading, I recommend Greenwald's book, With Liberty and Justice for Some.
Try shooting prime lenses instead of zooms. By cutting down your lens, you have to change your image by walking around instead of zooming, and I find it to be a more pleasant experience. Besides, primes have a faster max aperture than zooms, so they are amazing in low light. Zooms are distracting, heavy, and obnoxious. Useful for sports and potentially some journalism, but for portraits, art, and street shooting, a few primes are my favorite way to go. 28mm, 40mm, and maybe up to an 85. But I tend to stick with 40mm and 57mm primes for a day out on the street. Quite compact, especially the 40mm.
If you can't lie to your software, then it controls you, and you have no power. Apple could do more in this aspect for control.
Many non-white people live in Portland. Educate yourself.
I'll take 500ms page loads any day when the content comes from the true origin. I don't want 60ms responses from a Google server when I'm trying to use the internet.
Why not just make google the internet?? There's power and freedom to be had when publishers aren't tied to a tech behemoth.
So back to how this relates to an Android being tied to Google Play: you as the user don't have ultimate control over your device. And that means you don't fully own your device.
That's my perception of the main issues with control from Apple and Google. Lots of great software and hardware being produced, but we need to have more power over the operation of our gadgets.
Please elaborate.
Profits should be split, regardless of how tips are handled.
They try to keep the cost of food at 30%, as is common in business. COG around 1/3 or less.
So when we have a really busy night, there is excess profit relative to the amount of tips.
Assuming tips are a constant percentage of sales, the amount we earn extra is proportionate to sales.
But there is a certain minimum number of sales the owner must reach to break even. At a certain volume, profit accelerates further, but tips are still relatively constant.
So my desire would be for a restaurant to split excess revenues more equitably in addition to whatever baseline wage they set.
For anyone not aware, Apple is extremely hostile to device longevity and 3rd party repair [1]. They have had issues with hinge design in MacBooks as well as the Bendgate crisis for the iPhone 6 series.
They bricked phones when people had other repair shops fix their home buttons (Touch ID sensors).
Apple wants to control everything, sell you a device with a short lifespan, and then force upgrades.