I checked Wattvision right after that and there were no updates, so today I'm super happy to see that the hardware is available. If it proves to work well, hopefully we'll see a story on CNN (i.e. to the public at large) in the next few months.
993 karma · joined January 30, 2009
"If you have built castles in the air, your work need not be lost; that is where they should be. Now put the foundations under them." Walden
(define Y (λ (f)
((λ (x) (f (λ (y) ((x x) y))))
(λ (x) (f (λ (y) ((x x) y)))))))
(((pryced com) at) dbul)I checked Wattvision right after that and there were no updates, so today I'm super happy to see that the hardware is available. If it proves to work well, hopefully we'll see a story on CNN (i.e. to the public at large) in the next few months.
http://blogmaverick.com/2009/02/25/will-mobile-pdas-phones-r...
Long answer: My imagination was something designed specifically for pushing websites to some degree of success. So without me having to think of all of the different dimensions that bring a site to success (clearly state what it is, beautiful design, something people want, easy to use) -- the site I have in mind would walk you through that process taking your money at iterations of each step. In the end, you should have a site that meets the standards of sites which are already winners with most if not all of the dimensions in question.
Anyone know if a service exists (-MTurk) where you can pay people to constantly review your site?
I think that'd be an awesome way to evolve a website. Just apply constant feedback by paying people to launching fast and iterating.
Same goes for websites. People send in "HN please review my site" all the time.
At first I thought you were being facetious, but then I saw your app. It would be interesting if you compared sales of 1.1 and 1.2 since they are so dramatically different aesthetically.
Well, the app is out there, but it is useless unless you are in the City of Pittsburgh. My approach to the startup is unconventional: I'm laying down pieces which will be played later on. It feels like chess. Not a chance a VC would ever fund us because of that. Yet it is no doubt as likely or more likely we will fail among startups.
Thanks. Do it because you love it.
I've never had a Mac until last year, and I've been programming in Java for 10 years. Java is my least favorite language, but I think it is one of the easiest for most people. To me, Objective C is easy, but then again C was my first language. So it just depends on what you are comfortable with, really.
You probably won't make any money at it, but on the other hand, you probably won't make any money at iPhone development either
The first thing I did was program a rather involved iPhone application pertaining to my startup. I released it for free, updated it, no problems. The second thing I did was make a really simple application and sell it for $0.99 -- and it is making money without me having to do anything further. Before I released my first app, I would hear all of these "You probably won't make any money" stories and wasn't sure what to think. What I did was: have fun. If you aren't going to enjoy programming and you expect mad earnings, then yeah, throw in the towel.
For the first, there is probably some satisfaction in helping people's XML-based loan transactions reach the bank, etc. Y Combinator is perfect for the second group -- they can give it a shot and if they fail, hey, they'll probably have a great story to tell their interviewer. The last group probably realizes the odds are against them, but with enough attempts they think they'll make it (and if not they loved doing it anyway).
I'm definitely in the third group. The way I evaluate risk and opportunity is I imagine what kind of a life I could live: As an employee I could have a positive effect on thousands of people who need the utilities I'm building for them. As a researcher I might accomplish something on the order of curing Polio.
But I have too many things I want to do and it requires capital to get them all started. Otherwise, it would take many lifetimes to do them without capital. I want to experiment with creating projects that have a positive impact on society. So for me the risk is minimal considering if I don't try to create a successful startup, I'll be miserable. I'm just not the type of person who can settle for a job. Sometimes I wish I were, but I'm not.
OK, I checked:
(= long-domains* '("blogspot" "wordpress" "livejournal" "blogs" "typepad"
"weebly" "blog-city"
; "sampasite" "multiply" "wetpaint" ; let's just try banning
"eurekster" "blogsome" "edogo" "blog" "com"))http://500hats.typepad.com/500blogs/2009/08/your-solution-is...
Christof Koch at CalTech (hi, virgil) http://www.klab.caltech.edu/~koch/
Larry Yaeger & John Beggs http://www.indiana.edu/~rcapub/v30n2/mindmade.shtml
Of course, Douglas Hofstadter http://www.cogsci.indiana.edu/
Koch, Churchland, etc. speak on consciousness: http://mitworld.mit.edu/video/342
Failure? What's that?
http://www.cs.indiana.edu/~jwmills/ANALOG.NOTEBOOK/klm/klm.h...
But consider the hypothetical in another industry. Someone gets a shot at an unpaid internship, they do really well, the company they are associated with gives them a recommendation, and immediately after the internship they get an offer for a position in that industry. Or: Someone does not get an internship, it is a competitive industry, the person ends up working an $8 / hr job for the next some odd years until they get an opening in the industry. It would seem the benefit to the unpaid intern could be greater than the benefit to the company.
Of course, there is the scenario where the person becomes an entrepreneur.
http://www.dol.gov/esa/whd/regs/statutes/FairLaborStandAct.p...
2) I think the applicant pool is getting large enough that it is worth the risk. pg said the applicant pool was eclipsing 1000. The first round had, what, 220? And most of those companies were successful. If I were to apply, I would stick with one of the 5 ideas that I have brewing, and I think a lot of other people would stick with their ideas too.
1) It is good to be in an environment where others are hard at work because you'll be less likely to screw around.
2) It feels like you are doing something fun (you are "out") and at the same time working hard.
3) Home can be quite distracting unless you are fortunate enough to have a large house with a nice office.
Not entirely true. Borders is probably the only place I know that still charges for wifi. Everywhere else it is either free or you get two hours free by entering some kind of code.
Just from observation, so many people come in and stay for just a few minutes or take their coffee to go that it's kind of a nice equilibrium. It's rare that you'll find a coffee shop in Pittsburgh to 100% capacity (except perhaps Sunday afternoon or evening in the fall and spring). Electricity costs nothing. If anything, having people in your coffee shop serves as a kind of advertisement that it is a place people want to be for whatever reason -- the coffee is good or they just feel comfortable there.
As fantastic as Manhattan is, there are two reasons why I wouldn't want to live there: too many tourists and too few coffee shops. The best I could find in the upper west side was Cosi, a chain. The best I could find around Soho was some piece that closed earlier than shops in Pittsburgh. And the best I could find in the Upper East Side closed a couple years ago. Pittsburgh, baby. Awesome place to live if you love the coffee shops.