1,571 karma · joined December 3, 2007
email is daniel (at) ohuiginn.net
† i.e. I've repeatedly heard it as folk wisdom, but never looked for statistics
There's not one specific question I'd ask to figure that out. Depending on how the conversation goes it might be asking about the background of the founders, or their plans for the coming months, or how they assess their threats.
https://web.archive.org/web/20160220090011/https://hyperalle...
The US is now one of the countries where your success in life is most fully determined by your family background.
e.g. it's in the bottom third of the OECD for income mobility, and the absolute worst in the OECD for how much your family background determines your educational success
https://www.epi.org/publication/usa-lags-peer-countries-mobi...
I've given it a quick try, and it seems to work fine with this site
You'll still need some way to deal with ongoing edit wars -- I'd imagine the mapping of Jerusalem to be prickly, for example. But at least you can tell that content is dangerous and direct your human review in that direction.
streams, type inference, lambda expressions, an official REPL: big changes, which effectively targeted some of the biggest pain-points in earlier Java.
I'm no insider, but I feel like a lot of this comes down to Bloomberg terminal. That seems to be where lots of people get their aggregates of estimates, at least as a common starting point.
Nuclear normally sucks for fluctuating demand, but presumably a 6 month on/off cycle is slow enough to work.
When your break is on a fixed schedule, you're more likely to have something left half-finished. That makes it much easier to jump back in 5 minutes later.
Personally I gain more from the easy resumability than I lose by not having the break-for-abstract-thinking which you describe. Doubtless this varies massively between from person to person.
Helpful of them to give everybody trying to break this a measure of how well they are doing. Much easier to optimize against than a binary succeed/fail.
[and even poor people may be advertising targets, for the right customer. Loan sharks? Political parties? Religious groups?]
I'm sure in a day or two Tomi will post an entertainingly vicious commentary on the fall of Elop.
If I rate what I learned this week at 0/5, it's labelled "I've not learned a thing since the early 90s". Cute, but not really the same thing.
Likewise, all the stress descriptions seem to be about workload.
What I want, and will probably never get round to implementing, is Markov chain playlist generation. Collect play order from (high-quality, human-generated) playlists, then use them to build Markov chains of tracks that tend to be played after one another.
and to end a post about a paper people can't read with "Maybe I’m being naive here, but I think a major reason behind false memes is that checking sources sounds much harder and more intimidating than it actually is." -- that's just rubbing it in!
I've not found anything as good in English, but presumably it's out there somewhere.
Otherwise, I find it useful to read through archives. The Guardian does a good job of tagging everything. The New York Times is good for world news by country -- e.g. if you want to know what's been going on in Poland lately, start at http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/international/countriesan...
Also, Spiegel Online put up some of their best articles in English, though they can be frustratingly pompous and long-winded.
(process(line) for line in open('giantfile.txt') if line.lstrip()[0] != '#')
Is that line really using any new features in Python 3? The lazy evaluation there is in the file object and the generator expression, both of which have long been present in python2.