czechdeveloper

There is nothing wrong with doing stuff just for fun.

There is nothing wrong with being focused on just few issues.

But I have doubts when you claim some knowledge without being able to use it practically, which is what I see here.

If I'd say I'm jack of all trades, as I'm interrsted in software - but i hire a guy to make all the code for me because I don't know how - and that I'm very interested in knives - but my wife sharpens our knives as I don't know how - I have doubts about your actual knowledge if those fields.

I could not figure out an argument without sounding too confrontational toward you or OP, so sorry :).

But if your knowledge can't fulfill your need in same field, what is that knowledge for, or is that even actual knowledge?

This I don't understand.

You are interested in economy and politics, yet you don't know how to file taxes. Is that not connected?

If you understand mechanics, yet can't do maintenance on your car, not even talking about fixing anything.

This level of theoretical knowledge that can't overreach to reality to do basic tasks seems just irrelevant to me. What is it good for apart of talking about it?

I think issues is that it's artificial cash.

A lot of people expected inflation with newly printed money (central banks poured ridiculous amount new money in economy after 2008), but it never arrived. Because that money never found a way from investment to consumer goods, so for normal people the inflation is pretty standard.

Except of prices of housing, which is also an investment asset.

Inflation in investment assets is quite larger and we consider it "economic growth".

Global warming is totally real problem.

And you sketching some wars on a timeline and prediction time and scope of another just based on that is totally not a real problem.

You get it. All suggestions here are same way of thinking that got us into this situation.

Just curious, why will you not participate? Why leave it on younger generation?

That is big IF. I can say opposite: what if they do not care anymore as they already saw the place. It has same validity.

There are. But downsides are greater as they lead to destruction of very places they visit for their beauty.

In such scenario you can't count on traditional investments either.

It's mostly the land as I understand that.

It's just place where you can be pessimistic by default. It's forgotten everywhere else it seems.

It's directly on home page:

    Multiple languages.
    Use the same commands across multiple languages: Python, JavaScript, Java, and more on the way.

I moved to place with trees. Paid extra for that. After a year in, the forest died due to drought (and bugs). Now I'm looking at forest being cut down and removed. It's quite miserable feeling.

It's not Microsoft choice. They have to listen to US laws.

It make sense if you think about it, but I would really not figure it out myself, that is true.

Well, we face multitude of issues. For example loss of biodiversity is likely as important as global warming.

As remote developer, I must disagree.

There has always been distractions in office. Colleague would just walk over to you.

Now you get message. You can choose what you check and when. And reaction that is not immediate is usually fine. At least at my company.

And best of all, I don't have to be in same office to be able to communicate. I'm not even in same country, yet we can work realtime with team.

If we really meant it with climate policies, cruise ships and private jets would be banned immediately.

All "how to use tablet as development machines" I saw were just "how to connect keyboard to tablet and connect to remote computer".

My only hope is that I will not end up in the second one.

Well, the third part never came, so it's just "Embrace, extend". I'm ok with that.

0 is also very important for driving, camping etc. Water freezing is just so important point.

Interestingly this works only if you have background color explicitly set. Otherwise you still get light background.

Removing CO2 is not geoengineering in my book. That is reversing what we did and I'm all for that.

Geoengineering is for example emitting particles to atmosphere to lower amount of sunlight hitting earth. This will cause sky to change color, lower yield of crops and possibly other unknown consequences. That I would rather live without. That is last resort think, not first think to do.

We don't even have carbon tax, plane fuel is not taxed etc. and we already talk about geoengineering. This is crazy.

I really hope not. We don't even know all consequences of geo-engineering. Well, we know it will lower yield of crops on which we depend to feed ourselves.

Future is green or none at all.

I have one too and I can get over 1 000ppm by myself in quite big room while my room also has automatic air recuperation.

I can't imagine how it is in any "van dweller" or "tiny house" place.

If you drive motorcycle, you can get 10 000ppm in your helmet, that is close to being out of mind.

They were even thinking about requesting blockchain rollback (that possibly means making fork and paying to miners to follow that fork instead). If that would pass, that would really doom bitcoin as is.

For me it's difficult to comprehend this, as my native language just does not have 2 words for it.

Not having any seems more reasonable every day.