cwmoore

Not OP but “actual exponential complexity” should work, what is really your issue with that comment?

…the one call that requires a genuine decision from you.

Which one?

Lets just not redo subscription gods

Understanding ChatGpt Retirement

—

Usually when I encounter "money never works" it's because (a) it has never been tried and (b) because of simple greed and envy. Reproductive collapse seems like a pet peeve of yours, and while I can offer about 8 billion examples to the contrary, it wasn't the discussion I thought I was participating in.

No, he mentioned it. Here’s a link:

https://www.cms.gov/data-research/statistics-trends-and-repo...

Try this then:

> that never works

Citation needed.

s/“That never works.”/“mine,mine,mine,mine,mine”/g

Thomas is not hallucinating.

It is not less difficult to save the orangutans while people are being killed too.

Not this data, but from nearby 3D star map with rotations:

https://www.ouruboroi.com/moire3

How does that make a difference?

The question was "unconditional help", and one answer is "yes, if you can afford to, and want to".

So an enterprising drug-dealer can buy the house for a little baggie, hire the junkie to shovel the sidewalk, and rent it out, now everyone is employed, housed, and the free market actually absorbed the cost. The dealer will pay property taxes, to keep eyes off of the other business, the junkie will be safe and motivated to contribute, what else? Oh, social services jobs don't get to practice measured goodness to Skinner Box Volunteers, and it might hurt the cause to see photographs of the yard.

It is run by self-motivated humans and it often doesn't work.

Sounds like they trust the game’s anonymity and privacy policies.

Or, live as a solitary hermit and the average person you encounter is almost exactly like you. But how do you know you can trust them after they’ve isolated you from society?

Actually, no, you have to commit a crime to get in. The ride in handcuffs is free-as-in-compulsory.

Programs are watched carefully for embezzlement, not really accountable for positive outcomes.

And then there are people who aren't families, without the knack for conveying a moving story, or exceptionally good in every way but unfair circumstances.

Many of these people, and not just the really, really bad nuisance ones people use as excuses to superiority, are literally slaves, performing the scarecrow work of deterrence as living examples, for "society", for no pay.

I think this is an injustice, subverted by its own cruelty, and one of the more compelling arguments for UBI.

Or the exact opposite of what you said.

Fair enough, but it is a political topic, and there are different and more confusing slices of the healthcare system exposed to patients than org spending breakdowns. Not sure how many of this thread's comments could hold water if falsification were universally applied.

Stop asking so many questions and buy the aspirin.

I don't understand your question or your comments. I have not considered the relevance of execution to this discussion, but I do not see fines and imprisonment as the same categories of punishment/correction at all.

I said it is - I'm not saying it should be.

No, not really. I’m just questioning the axiomatic statement.

Nice comment, and true enough, but $37 aspirin and similar is a criminal fraud, and so are the laws not treating it for the coercive robbery it is.

Close to the same percent that doesn’t have employer coverage, they’re saying, those too old or ill to work fulltime.

I say convert SSA to UBI, set a floor, and let the price of things find a new level with more people in the marketplace:

“We have numbers” is always refreshing, especially in a shell game. Cost of all licensed medical practitioners? Or overweighting incomes of outlier CEO physicians? 25% is a steep tax on health in any case.