The official Signal website is signal.org
Because of the security and privacy focus of the app, it is best to look there for news about Signal.
1,006 karma · joined February 23, 2023
Because of the security and privacy focus of the app, it is best to look there for news about Signal.
To pretend to be a person that you are not, on demand, for months on end, is hard and it demands great empathy and skill.
Yet another big problem is that cargo might be too low in value, or even undesirable. Like the cargo of Ammonium Nitrate that exploded in Beirut a few years ago (it had been taken off the docked ship which then sank in the port. The cargo was stored in the port, then stuck in legal and payment disputes, and the result was horrific).
Real cities were all built in the past, for older vehicles, which moved at different speeds, and were controlled by drivers with different goals from today’s drivers.
So, if your game has bad and unsafe road designs, which have been partly retrofitted to reduce the worst problems, then that is accurate.
A game with optimal roads is not an accurate simulation of reality.
A professional modern road designer will simulate the expected movement of vehicles through a new or redesigned road, to try to discover major problems.
They look for problems with turning radius, visibility, stopping distances, and interactions with other road users.
I believe that a game designer could offer to do the same.
The game could draw a good algorithmic road shape first. But next offer the player an option to run a simulation of individual traffic movements, to discover serious issues, and let the player know about problems.
To the OP, I suggest this simulation approach, not trying to discover flawless algorithms. That’s not how it happens in the real world.
Several comments have suggested similar issues.
Also the issues other comments described, including that any fault in the barrier means a new safety hazard
If there’s nothing happening, then the obvious way for the authorities to prove that is to let observers in, and let independent information out. They do not do this, so I will take these reports of deaths more seriously.
One of the emails is yours
You mean these emails are more than just a first verification step to check that your email address exists and to confirm that you want to sign up as a new user?
Luckily, It sounds like this new failure is recoverable by normal user action.
But why not try? It is history, and you are a unique witness of it
Why?
Though, they do say “these patterns aren’t usually deliberate”.
But even being aware may not mean you really deeply understand why you have a problem.
One reason that it is funny is that it plays against that.
We the audience maybe forget for a moment that we are not watching real life. We are watching a drama or entertainment. So we expect something relevant to happen. That’s the convention.
The exchange plays with that expectation. It deliberately forces us out of our pleasant illusion and makes think us about our real experience - we are sitting in a seat and watching a performance, which is happening at that moment.
And nothing happens, just the same as real life
This story has used other titles, like - What We Lose by Letting AI Speak for Us
That’s an excellent question, but it is also similar to asking what will happen to wind turbines in a storm.
Maybe some will break. Maybe that’s an acceptable outcome. Probably they can be improved to reduce that risk
Maybe you meant CCDs? Not SSDs
Yes, if you only count purchase/sale conversions
Maybe no, if you also count clickthrough and view conversions, perhaps even lead conversions sometimes (because fake sign ups are possible).
But you’re right. Purchase conversions are one incentive
I guess there is no incentive in most markets. Facebook, etc make only a token effort to reject non-troublesome bot traffic.
[0] bots and other automated traffic which cannot generate revenue or human ad views
I agree. He was asking employees not to cash their paychecks sometimes. $5000 is inconsequential compared to that forced investment from employees and business partners
That was FedEx’s founder, Fred Smith. It wasn’t UPS
He only had $5,000 of funds remaining, which he gambled playing blackjack, so the potential loss to investors was small. He’d already lost almost all their investments through operating FeDex
If that happens, then the demand is big enough that companies would import millions of iPhones from other regions and sell them in the EU.
For warranty service, the company would ship the phones back to the original country where Apple sold them.
Then, if that causes Apple too much trouble, then Apple would have to detect that the phone had been spending most of the time in the EU, and refuse to provide free servicing under warranty.
That’s an interesting can of worms for Apple.
A competent human driver would instinctively slow down, look at the potential obstruction, and think about changing lanes or an emergency stop.
Most probably, the visible object is just some water spilled on the road or that kind of thing. But if it isn’t then it’s very dangerous
This car appeared to be blind to any risk. That’s not acceptable