237 karma · joined September 28, 2011
In contrast, Europe had to import spices and thus the common people didn't have access to spices. Cold weather also pushes people towards hunting by making farming difficult. Obvious outcome is potato, making beer from potato, eating meat, drying meat (steaks).
So now labor is also globalized. And hence you have a cheaper larger pool of resources which is killing the local entitlements. If you want to fix it you really need to become more socialist, create unions, and start lobbying your government.
But here is the thing - most Americans aren'y actually in the same shitty situation as the people in other countries who had just gotten out of colonial rule and ended up with globalization before being prosperous. Most Americans are still driving gas guzzlers while being 'unemployed'. Pray that they grow a brain before the tide swings too far to the other side, like it has in most other countries where USA is trying to destroy local markets.
Spoken like someone who never had the idea of moving to another country.
Here is the problem - those 12% unemployed will still walk around pretending that USA is the bestest country in the world where people have 'gotten their shit together', than to move to a different country and get a job - something that is unbelievably insanely easy if you are an American citizen.
Not joking. This is what American Indians say when I argue about corruption or workplace politicking - that Americans are much worse and much better at pretending it doesn't exist.
1) Did the most corruption. It wasn't that bad before it.
2) Created all the draconian laws to 'correct' Indian culture.
3) Put pressure on current generation to 'own a house' at the age of 25-30, while they themselves like all the people before them got their house at the ripe age of 50-60.
4) Themselves a product and participant of socialist government with anti-private business attitude, they increased the age of retirement for government jobs. You meet one government employee and tell him/her that you work for some IT company and they will mock you for 'getting undeserved salaries' and 'being ignorant of bureaucracy', whether it is for getting a passport or driving license.
And that is the whole debate here. Are we willing to let humanity end so AI can give birth to a better AI? I think not.
Did you participate in that candle march?
Lets not be careful at all at uploading some basic truths - minors are minors and we _adults_ can't change the definition based on our communal level of outrage.
1. Have a set of interesting graphs. sin(x), tan(x), log(x), e^x, 1/x, polynomials, hyperbola, sqrt(x)
2. Learn the effects of replacing x with f(x) -> sin(f(x)), log(f(x)), e^f(x). This is IMHO the most fun part. How will sin(1/x) look like? How will log(mod(sqrt(x))) look like?
3. Have a set of 'tricks'. What is the difference between sin(x) and sin(x) - A (ans. it moves the whole graph downward on y-scale). How to create mirror? (ans. take modulus). How to enlarge a graph? (ans. multiply with a constant).
4. Tackle the actual problem, edge by edge.
Regarding my comment being sexist - true. But one has to acknowledge the differences of sexes before aiming for equality.
A cave-man or a hunter (man) has only one meaning of powerful - physical. Today the meaning is changing, and Obama is powerful without having much body strength. Whether he is violent or not is something I will let you decide. But my point is that the anti-physical violence rhetoric one hears all day long is only a very recent phenomena and is directly related to what is considered more powerful today - war or politics.
NOTE: To people marking down my answers, what are your opinions about 'why women love cooking?' because statistically more women are found cooking than not, and 'why blacks like slavery?' because statistically more blacks were slaves than not? (HINT: Django Unchained anyone?)