HNHacker News
TopNewBestAskShowJobs

cryptodogemoon

349 karma · joined October 16, 2017

submissionscomments
cryptodogemoon··on Vitalik Unveils Ethereum 2.0 Roadmap
No, this is purely the internal economic model of bitcoin production concerning work/energy/value input versus output to workers.

Imagine someone tells you they've created a money printing machine that prints 21m BTC, and they design the machine to give them most of the BTC and when it arrives in your town the man says "well it looks like the rules have changed now and your work isn't worth as much as my work because you encountered the magic box after me"

The users who ran the software on the network in 2010 required much less value input to generate bitcoins. Acording to Satoshis design, a user running the software now on an identical computer would not produce the same rewards for their work. This is essentially an intentional ponzi design.

Users who aquired bitcoins for low capital input are incentized to psychologically convince late adopters to purchase their bitcoins for more than it cost to produce and acquire.

cryptodogemoon··on Vitalik Unveils Ethereum 2.0 Roadmap
Early miners are exerting less energy and less work to produce more coins.

The difficulty curve often further benefits early miners to be taking minimal risk when the design is reverse logarithmic.

cryptodogemoon··on Vitalik Unveils Ethereum 2.0 Roadmap
There's no evidence to support your claim.

Even if one provided blockchain transaction logs, they might just be moving funds to wallets owned by the same user.

cryptodogemoon··on Vitalik Unveils Ethereum 2.0 Roadmap
Proof of Work simply facilitates existing capital to proportionately take over the network and supply.

It becomes notibly problematic if the total distribution is produced within a small window of time, locking out entire swaths of the population to be at the whim of horders (assuming there would be a genuine demand for the supply).

cryptodogemoon··on Vitalik Unveils Ethereum 2.0 Roadmap
As Satoshis minting algo was used, why should one user receive significantly more coins for such low effort simply for running the software at an early date?

The end result is early users exploiting users who join the network after them. Ponzi style.

cryptodogemoon··on Vitalik Unveils Ethereum 2.0 Roadmap
>Are you suggesting he provides a bigger reward for work as time goes on, thereby providing more currency later in the piece?

Yes.

The minting design Satoshi choose merely granted a few users the majority of the supply for the least amount of work. They can then horde and hope to sell at a profit to late adopters.

>That would be counter-intuitive to the idea of bitcoin as a fixed store of wealth

No, the total supply remains the same. Distribution and production is the issue. The linear curve should align to match the energy and work input, assuming that is representative of additional users joining the network.

Fixed store of wealth is even more difficult to achieve, as users must trust the design to be desirable.

cryptodogemoon··on Bitcoin World’s 30th Largest Currency, Market Cap Closes on Mastercard
Like any other product or service, when you exchange your money for BTC all that has happened is someone decided to sell you BTC and you gave them money.

BTCs exchange rate is dependent on someone else offering money. If there's a market panic, the price quickly drops due to a race to beat other orders.

cryptodogemoon··on Vitalik Unveils Ethereum 2.0 Roadmap
Satoshi actually used a manipulative log curve for his minting algorhythm which effectively created a ponzi style distribution scheme. The majority of BTC was produced to the small userbase for minimal effort, whereas time passes the computational work and wattage required to produce coins for late adopters increases as presumably more users discover the system.

Satoshi easily could have chosen a linear algorithm anticipating additional work input with more users, instead he designed a system to exploit late adopters.

The aspect of Bitcoins having a limited supply is mostly ineffective, as all the features of Bitcoin are now available in other service networks which are including more advanced features and better ASIC resistant algos.

cryptodogemoon··on Bitcoin Blows Past $9,000
Why Bitcoin forks? Exchanges would be where the fraud happens. MtGOX was insolvent and yet they inflated the price of Bitcoin across all exchanges. Bitfinex is alleged to be engaging in the same market manipulation through margin wash trades and their central bank scheme of free Tether minting.

Bitcoin forks are funny because it's decentralized software with a shared database history from the time of the fork. After an update, users can choose to use one or the other. Unfortunately the incentives are warped for miners and devs, so users might not have the best possible design.

There's an excessive amount of propaganda surrounding cryptocoins because "investors" need to psychologically lure you in to buy their supply, which they've acquired for significantly lower value, lower capital, and lower computational work then you if you're starting after them.

[0] https://medium.com/@bitfinexed/latest

cryptodogemoon··on Due to Bitcoin network fees, customer loses $10 trying to buy $25 game on Steam
The technical implementations and actions speak louder than words.

Bitcoin maximalists try to rationalize their design flaws, but ultimately it's simply software running a service. There are new teams working on improving designs and useful features meanwhile core has stagnated and stalled for years.

You're clearly emotionally and financially invested in advocating for a single cryptocurrency. Fortunately there are now many to choose from. :)

cryptodogemoon··on Due to Bitcoin network fees, customer loses $10 trying to buy $25 game on Steam
What?

The core developers (employed by Blockstream) have intentionally kept the block size at 1MB in order to support the product they're attempting to develop (lightening network layers) which lets them facilitate federated payment processors siphoning fees out.

It's a red herring to claim larger blocks increase centralization when it's just data storage. Drives are cheap. Centralization already happened once sha256 ASIC hardware was produced enmasse, preventing normal users from earning block rewards. The Bitcoin devs are lost in political dogmas, rather than improving the software for users.

Thankfully there's alternative iterations.

cryptodogemoon··on Bitcoin Mining Now Consuming More Electricity Than Many Countries
Throwing computational power at a PoW system for hash collisions is significantly more wasteful than simply reducing the cost of electricity itself or depositing the energy into a storage system for use at later in demand times.

If free energy needed to be expelled and couldn't be stored for some weird reason, it could be used to grind wheat, purify water, or run scientific computing to contribute to curing diseases rather than attempt to acquire speculative database tokens.

cryptodogemoon··on Bitcoin Mining Now Consuming More Electricity Than Many Countries
Proof of Steak mearly gives power to whomever has established wealth.

It is a marginal improvement over PoW, when the PoW algorithm is not computationally useful outside brute force hash lotteries and capital infrastructure race speculation.

Both PoS and PoW implementations should have heavy scrutiny on the distribution and minting rules for the base supply.

cryptodogemoon··on Bitcoin Mining Now Consuming More Electricity Than Many Countries
A battery system would be more useful and less wasteful.
cryptodogemoon··on Bitcoin Mining Now Consuming More Electricity Than Many Countries
There's an irony in proof of work as means of producing a currency supply to thwart centralized financial institutions when the people with existing capital are in the most advantageous position to take over the minting and infrastructure of Proof of Work.
cryptodogemoon··on Bitcoin Mining Now Consuming More Electricity Than Many Countries
Banks offer many services in addition to secure and insured deposits. The same cannot be said for wallet software made by anonymous internet devs with a lower barrier to implant obfuscated back doors to steal user funds irreversibly.

Bitcoin is in a competitive market so energy usage will be more relevant to compare against the decentralized services offering identical functionality with alternative algorithms, like litecoin, monereo, ethereum, and so on.

cryptodogemoon··on Bitcoin's Enormous Energy Costs May Prove to Be Its Biggest Risk
Why bother with a second layer when new blockchain designs improve upon the designs of Bitcoin? The ledger is "secured" by about 6 mining pools which might even be controlled by the same people.

Second layer goes completely against Satoshi's primary design in the first sentence of the white paper - which is removing the need for third parties. The lightening network design is a siphoning power grab by Blockstream.

After all, if you look at Bitcoin from a technical perspective the services Bitcoin offers are available in Litecoin, Monoero, etc.

cryptodogemoon··on Bitfinex never ‘repaid’ their tokens, they started a ponzi scheme
Their claim of 0 fees will not last. It means DDOSing will be trivial, and their network will be crippled.
cryptodogemoon··on Fiat is Effective: fiat for the crypto crowd [pdf]
> Blockchain and Bitcoin is different than physical resources because it's so easily produced.

  The whole point of PoW is that it 
  is not easy to produce Bitcoin -- 
  physical goods have scarcity 
  enforced by nature; Bitcoin has 
  scarcity enforced by mathematics.
This is not true. The math in Satoshi's mining algorithm produced most of the coins for extremely low value input.

Most people are simply unaware how the supply was gathered very early on, effectively in the style of a pump and dump scheme.

To be more specific, half the supply was minted at low computational effort from 2009-2013. Mining was made easy so Satoshi could maximize ownership of the supply, hoping speculators would purchase the units for a sum surpassing the value it took to produce the coins.

Bitcoin advocates try to dismiss how easy it is to produce blockchain tokens. Satoshi could just as easily have made the algorithm produce bitcoins in limited quantities early on especially with each coin being divisible to 100000000 units each. Instead Satoshi choose a very easy way to generate the coins before other users took notice of his network.

Along with how easy it is to manipulate prices on exchanges. Exchanges will make huge profits during freefalls because they have no oversight on their order books. There's a reason the exchanges often set up shell companies and use off shore banks in jurisdictions often associated with gambling and credit card fraud.

The market is hardly user driven, it's now at the whim of which exchange can fake their order books while surviving public relations to avoid their solvency getting called out for. Take note how often exchanges have delays with customer withdraws.

cryptodogemoon··on Dash – A Governance and Privacy Coin
verge offers nothing interesting in terms of privacy or features. its just a boring clone with a forced TOR connection.

the marketing is great though!

cryptodogemoon··on Fiat is Effective: fiat for the crypto crowd [pdf]
"Satoshi" choose to produce the largest percentage of the total Bitcoin supply to the smallest group of users for the lowest computational effort/value input.

Rather than designing the supply distribution to coincide with increasing computational and energy value input, the production curve was crafted to gain control of as many coins as possible before anyone else joined the network.

This is a catastrophic design flaw as it means the majority of BTC in circulation was created with very low value input. i.e. 10,000 bitcoins shouldn't surpass the value of two pizzas.

The current value is a mix of passing on the "coins" to greater fools who only think someone else will buy their coin at a higher price. Combined with exchanges which arnt required to publish their reserves, or prevent insider trading or falsifying bids.

More stability will come if verifiable liquidity is offered at any of the exchanges. As we've seen many times, panic sells over trivial news and rumors create freefalls in price from the absence of buyers willing to hold the bag.

cryptodogemoon··on Fiat is Effective: fiat for the crypto crowd [pdf]
The production curve Satoshi designed was to produce the largest supply of Bitcoins for the least amount of effort/resource input to the smallest group of users running the software. Half of the supply was produced this way in the first few months.

Blockchain and Bitcoin is different than physical resources because it's so easily produced.

Crypto tokens are different from other traded instruments because of the exchanges they're traded on are unregulated exchanges which can easily manipulate prices, fake orders, front run, or entirely falsify their deposits until there's run on the withdraws.

cryptodogemoon··on Fiat is Effective: fiat for the crypto crowd [pdf]
Volitilty will be inherent with bitcoin, and any blockchain database where the supply has been distributed for low computational/energy/capital input to the small pool of users who aquire majority stake in the total supply, thus devaluing any long term inherent store of value.

additionally, bitcoin and the exchanges can rapidly plummit to zero if and when there's a run to get out as the value requires demand from another just buyer. no buyers, and the price freefalls.

cryptodogemoon··on Fiat is Effective: fiat for the crypto crowd [pdf]
Tether and it's sister company, Bitfinex have had a long history of extremely suspicious and opaque behavior.

The CEO has been quoted as sympathetic towards a known ponzi scheme after it vanished with everyone's deposits.

https://steemit.com/bitfinex/@gaitan/bitfinex-ceo-suspected-...

Raphaelle Nicole, the CEO of Bitfinex invested in the past years in a number of ponzi schemes and also supported Trendon Shavers, who was found guilty recently for "a classic ponzi scheme" and was sentenced to 18 months in prison. In 2012, Raphaelle tried his own ponzi scheme: “When I need more coins than I have to fill an order, I will ask everyone that previously “registered” with me to lend me some btc. After 7 days, I will return all of it, principal + 2% interests [per week]…. Now the questions you might have: What could you do to make so much profit? Let just say that I do “arbitrage”: I buy low and sell high.”

Here is the summary of Tether:

https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/6xpddt/as_20m_more_tet...

https://medium.com/@bitfinexed/latest

https://twitter.com/Bitfinexed

https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/7059hr/more_25_million...

← PreviousPage 2 of 2