createaccount99

Wouldn't using tailwind with `@apply` rules be a double win? You get tailwind to tweak the one-offs, and you get classless in the typical case. A couple kb more CSS perhaps, but that's negligible.

I hope they give up on their own agent, it's decent but I don't see it as worth the effort.

Isn't it about equal treatment? You can't buy one person everything they want, just because they have high salary, otherwise the employee next door will get salty.

Anti-feature if you ask me. An agent should be able to pick the stuff it needs from the AGENTS.md, and not blindly use everything.

I have the 3 default "annoyances" listed enabled, ublock, easylist, adguard. I rarely see cookie popups. Notably, youtube's cookie popup still appears, but probably there's a reason for it. So, you're right, however for me it's good enough.

Based on the title, I was expecting a flow editor GUI, actually.

"Moderation" for bacon being zero

That is an oversimplification, and not the whole truth. Read anthropic's blog posts if you want to learn more, or ask gpt5.

uBo has a filter list for blocking out cookie popups, why not use that instead?

I thought all acquisitions were done on leverage these days, is stock actually switching hands and not just magic money?

Webcomponents are such a mess! Never ever will I use them as they are presented.

That's a fresh joke, had a good laugh

Incredibly buggy still

AGPL + selling under other licenses seems to be the way

What an overly verbose article.

You can disable read receipts in the settings, but then you won't see their read receipts. This is fair.

Fleet too or not? Is fleet still being developed, I can't recall.

What an uneducated take.

> Being able to read messages without sending read receipts via the widget is a great feature.

More like an unfair anti-feature

They mentioned in a previous thread that selling business features (SAML, SSO, idk) is their plan.

it doesn't have bluetooth but has speaker/mic? Am I getting that right?

What is the degree supposed to do for you? Just print a fake one if it's for your mom

Where's the source code

Sigh. This is a fundamental misunderstanding of Mozilla's situation. The "weird license nonsense" you're vaguely gesturing at doesn't even make sense in context. Firefox is open source under MPL 2.0.

Your framing that "the choice is between giving all my browsing data to Google and to Mozilla" creates a false equivalence. Even with their recent privacy policy changes, Mozilla's approach is structurally different from Google's core business model.

And "Chrome works marginally better"? By what metric? Firefox has better memory usage, stronger privacy protections, and doesn't exist primarily as a data collection tool for the world's largest advertising company.

The idea that you'd "happily buy Firefox" misses the point of Mozilla's mission for an open web. This kind of uninformed take that ignores the nuances of browser economics is exactly why we can't have nice things on the open web.

It gets DDOS'd 24/7

Why would they release Claude Code as closed source? Let's hope DeepSeek-r2 delivers, Anthropic is dead. I mean, it's a tool designed to eat itself. Absurd to close source.

Did you run the Aider benchmarks to get a comparison of Claude Code vs. Aider?

Is aider still relevant vs. Claude Code?

I wish this fake cold war ended already

> That means my browser is pretending to be Firefox AND Safari on an Intel chip.

That's not the case, that ua is Chrome on MacOS. The rest is backward compatibility garbage